Reasons for confidence.
Abstract
People are often overconfident in evaluating the correctness of their knowl-edge. The present studies investigated the possibility that assessment of con-fidence is biased by attempts to justify one's chosen answer. These attempts include selectively focusing on evidence supporting the chosen answer and disregarding evidence contradicting it. Experiment 1 presented subjects with two-alternative questions and required them to list reasons for and against each of the alternatives prior to choosing an answer and assessing the prob-ability of its being correct. This procedure produced a marked improvement in the appropriateness of confidence judgments. Experiment 2 simplified the manipulation by asking subjects first to choose an answer and then to list (a) one reason supporting that choice, (b) one reason contradicting it, or (c) one reason supporting and one reason contradicting. Only the listing of contradicting reasons improved the appropriateness of confidence. Correla-tional analyses of the data of Experiment 1 strongly suggested that the con-fidence depends on the amount and strength of the evidence supporting the answer chosen. e remarkable characteristic of human>ry is its knowledge of its own content, nents of confidence in the correctness 'all and recognition performance are research was supported by the Advanced ch Projects Agency of the Department of e, and was monitored by Office of Naval
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When people try to reason through an issue, they often work hard to find evidence that confirms their initial perspective.
“When people try to reason through an issue, they often work hard to find evidence that confirms their initial perspective 55-58 .”
From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Perceived informativeness of facts.
Fischhoff, B. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.2.349 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Self-citationLichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(80)90052-5 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Self-citationVerification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability
BRIER, G. W. (1950) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078%3c0001:vofeit%3e2.0.co;2
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · see citing works
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267 · see citing works
Dimensions of Consumer Expertise
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209080 · Cited by 4,375 · see citing works
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991 · see citing works
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650 · Cited by 3,504 · see citing works
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · Cited by 2,592 · see citing works
The trouble with overconfidence.
Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.502 · Cited by 2,358 · see citing works
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298 · see citing works
HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known
Kerr, N. L. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 · Cited by 1,989 · see citing works
SPERBER, D., CLÉMENT, F., HEINTZ, C., MASCARO, O., MERCIER, H., ORIGGI, G., & WILSON, D. (2010) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x · Cited by 1,795 · see citing works
Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.506 · Cited by 1,506 · see citing works
Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning
Koriat, A. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Self-citationSupport theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167 · see citing works
Motivated inference: Self‐serving generation and evaluation of causal theories
Kunda, Z. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases
Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.11.1.109 · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing
Koriat, A. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.609 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Self-citationDunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019737 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611010 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Metacognition and consciousness
Koriat, A. (2007) · The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816789.012 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociative processes in intuitive judgment
Morewedge, C. K., & Kahneman, D. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Test prediction and performance in a classroom context.
Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
What we know about spreadsheet errors
Panko, R. R. (1998) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.1998040102 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C. (2007) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39003-x · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Psychological Strategies for Winning a Geopolitical Forecasting Tournament
Mellers, B., Ungar, L., Baron, J., Ramos, J., Gurcay, B., Fincher, K., Scott, S. E., Moore, D., Atanasov, P., Swift, S. A., et al. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614524255 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
The Accuracy-Confidence Correlation in the Detection of Deception
DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_5 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Physicians’ Diagnostic Accuracy, Confidence, and Resource Requests: A Vignette Study
Meyer, A. N. D., Payne, V. L., Meeks, D. W., Rao, R., & Singh, H. (2013) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10081 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility
Porter, T., Elnakouri, A., Meyers, E. A., Shibayama, T., Jayawickreme, E., & Grossmann, I. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Harvey, N. (1997) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(97)01014-0 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory
Mitchum, A. L., Kelley, C. M., & Fox, M. C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0039923 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Mazancieux, A., Fleming, S. M., Souchay, C., & Moulin, C. J. A. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000746 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
An Assessment Instrument of Technological Literacies in Makerspaces and FabLabs
Blikstein, P., Kabayadondo, Z., Martin, A., & Fields, D. (2017) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20156 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Confirmation Bias and the Sexual Double Standard
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2006) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Overconfidence as dissonance reduction
Blanton, H., Pelham, B. W., DeHart, T., & Carvallo, M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1458 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Chang, W., Chen, E., Mellers, B., & Tetlock, P. (2016) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004599 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Naguib, M., Brull, S. J., Hunter, J. M., Kopman, A. F., Fülesdi, B., Johnson, K. B., & Arkes, H. R. (2019) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000003714 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Known Unknowns: A Critical Determinant of Confidence and Calibration
Walters, D. J., Fernbach, P. M., Fox, C. R., & Sloman, S. A. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2580 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Forecasting tournaments, epistemic humility and attitude depolarization
Mellers, B., Tetlock, P., & Arkes, H. R. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.021 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Favazzo, L., Willford, J. D., & Watson, R. M. (2014) · Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.693 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Search & Verify: Misinformation and source evaluations in Internet search results
Dennis, A. R., Moravec, P. L., & Kim, A. (2023) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2023.113976 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-118
- ISSN
- 0096-1515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026136470
- Cited by
- 1,477
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- overconfidence, confidence judgments, metacognition, self-knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review