The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Living with Contradictions · doi:10.4324/9780429499142-5 · Cited by 7,232
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682 · cited 1×
“Unfortunately, this particularistic research strategy often prevents the kind of generalizations that social psychologists view as contributions to theory-development (McCall 2005).”
BackgroundCritical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement
Caldwell, V. F., & Crenshaw, K. W. (1996) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1123408 · Cited by 3,897
Anderson, K., & Davis, A. Y. (1982) · The Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1903191 · Cited by 1,087
Beal, F. M. (2008) · Meridians · doi:10.2979/mer.2008.8.2.166 · Cited by 511 · cited 3×
““Double jeopardy” was introduced in the early 1970’s to characterize dual discrimination based on racism and sexism (Beale 1979).”
Background
Cited by
Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/669608 · Cited by 4,126
Intersectionality and research in psychology
Cole, E. R. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0014564 · Cited by 2,722
The Psychology of Working Theory.
Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Diemer, M. A., & Autin, K. L. (2016) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000140 · Cited by 1,020
Carbado, D. W. (2013) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/669666 · Cited by 441
Moradi, B., & Grzanka, P. R. (2017) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000203 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P.
- Venue
- Sex Roles
- Published
- 2008-04-07
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 377-391
- ISSN
- 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2762
- OpenAlex
- W2147068122
- Cited by
- 1,677
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 65.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
- The paper
- Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
