CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 455Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is Fat a Feminist Issue? Exploring the Gendered Nature of Weight Bias

Fikkan, Janna L., Rothblum, Esther D.·2012·Sex Roles
DOI 10.1007/s11199-011-0022-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-011-0022-5

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 167 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Frater, L. (2009). Fat heroines in Chick-Lit: Gateway to acceptance in the mainstream? In E. Rothblum & S. Solovay (Eds.), The fat studies reader (pp. 235–240). New York: New York University Press.
  2. Giovanelli, D., & Ostertag, S. (2009). Controlling the body: Media representations, body size, and self-discipline. In E. Rothblum & S. Solovay (Eds.), The fat studies reader (pp. 289–296). New York: New York University Press.
  3. Griffin, A. W. (2007). Women and weight-based employment discrimination. Cardozo Journal of Law and Gender, 13, 631–662.
  4. Haskins, K. M., & Ransford, H. E. (1999). The relationship between weight and career payoffs among women. Sociological Forum, 14, 295–318. doi: 10.1023/A:1021470813182 . · DOI
  5. Hesse-Bieber, S. N. (2007). The cult of thinness (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Mendoza, K. R. (2009). Seeing through the layers: Fat suits and thin bodies in The Nutty Professor and Shallow Hal. In E. Rothblum & S. Solovay (Eds.), The fat studies reader (pp. 280–288). New York: New York University Press.
  7. Prohaska, A., & Gailey, J. (2009). Fat women as “easy targets”: Achieving masculinity through hogging. In E. D. Rothblum & S. Solovay (Eds.), The fat studies reader (pp. 158–166). New York: New York University Press.
  8. Register, C. A., & Williams, D. R. (1990). Wage effects of obesity among young workers. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 131–141.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 455

Related

Metadata

Authors
Fikkan, J. L., & Rothblum, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Fikkan, Janna L.
ORCID
Rothblum, Esther D.
Venue
Sex Roles
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-06-19
Volume
66
Issue
9-10
Pages
575-592
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
DOI
10.1007/s11199-011-0022-5
OpenAlex
W2053073563
Cited by
455
References
167
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
33.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight stigma, fat women, weight discrimination, intersectionality, ethnicity, employment discrimination, discrimination in education, romantic relationships, health care discrimination, psychotherapy, media representation, feminist theory, fear of fat, lived experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review