Cited by 1,968Obesity, Physical Activity, DietHealth disparities and outcomesObesity and Health Practices

Socioeconomic Status and Obesity

McLaren, L.·2007·Epidemiologic Reviews

Abstract

The objective of this review was to update Sobal and Stunkard's exhaustive review of the literature on the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) and obesity (Psychol Bull 1989;105:260-75). Diverse research databases (including CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, and Social Science Abstracts) were comprehensively searched during the years 1988-2004 inclusive, using "obesity," "socioeconomic status," and synonyms as search terms. A total of 333 published studies, representing 1,914 primarily cross-sectional associations, were included in the review. The overall pattern of results, for both men and women, was of an increasing proportion of positive associations and a decreasing proportion of negative associations as one moved from countries with high levels of socioeconomic development to countries with medium and low levels of development. Findings varied by SES indicator; for example, negative associations (lower SES associated with larger body size) for women in highly developed countries were most common with education and occupation, while positive associations for women in medium- and low-development countries were most common with income and material possessions. Patterns for women in higher- versus lower-development countries were generally less striking than those observed by Sobal and Stunkard; this finding is interpreted in light of trends related to globalization. Results underscore a view of obesity as a social phenomenon, for which appropriate action includes targeting both economic and sociocultural factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/epirev/mxm001

Cites

364 of 364 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLaren, L.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
McLaren, L.
Venue
Epidemiologic Reviews
Published
2007-05-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
29-48
ISSN
  • 0193-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6729
OpenAlex
W2153630285
Cited by
1,968
References
364
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 147 · 2014: 158 · 2013: 153 · 2012: 162
FWCI
71.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiologic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
socioeconomic status, obesity, body size, occupation, income, material possessions, gender differences, socio-economic development, globalization, social determinants of health, sociocultural factors
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Social Class, Global Health, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review