Cited by 332Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Weighed Down by Stigma: How Weight‐Based Social Identity Threat Contributes to Weight Gain and Poor Health

Open access
Hunger, Jeffrey M., Major, Brenda, Blodorn, Alison, Miller, Carol T.·2015·Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Abstract

Weight stigma is pervasive, and a number of scholars argue that this profound stigma contributes to the negative effects of weight on psychological and physical health. Some lay individuals and health professionals assume that stigmatizing weight can actually motivate healthier behaviors and promote weight loss. However, as we review, weight stigma is consistently associated with poorer mental and physical health outcomes. In this article, we propose a social identity threat model elucidating how weight stigma contributes to weight gain and poorer mental and physical health among overweight individuals. We propose that weight‐based social identity threat increases physiological stress, undermines self‐regulation, compromises psychological health, and increases the motivation to avoid stigmatizing domains (e.g., the gym) and escape the stigma by engaging in unhealthy weight loss behaviors. Given the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the US, weight stigma thus has the potential to undermine the health and wellbeing of millions of Americans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/spc3.12172

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunger, J. M., Major, B., Blodorn, A., & Miller, C. T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Hunger, Jeffrey M.
Venue
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
255-268
ISSN
1751-9004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1533895333
Cited by
332
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 4
FWCI
53.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social and Personality Psychology Compass (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5R01HL112818-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
weight stigma, social identity threat, weight gain, obesity, overweight, mental health, physical health, physiological stress, self-regulation, stigma avoidance, social identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review