Cited by 17Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Sample Characteristics and Experience with Infidelity on Romantic Jealousy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-011-0048-8

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Becker, D. V., Sagarin, B. J., Guadagno, R. E., Millevoi, A., & Nicastle, L. D. (2004). When the sexes need not differ: Emotional responses to the sexual and emotional aspects of infidelity. Personal Relationships, 11, 529–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00096.x . · DOI
  2. Berman, M. I., & Frazier, P. A. (2005). Relationship power and betrayal experience as predictors of reactions to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1617–1627. doi: 10.1177/0146167205277209 . · DOI
  3. Brase, G. L., Caprar, D. V., & Voracek, M. (2004). Sex differences in responses to relationship threats in England and Romania. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 21, 763–764. doi: 10.1177/0265407504047836 . · DOI
  4. Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free.
  5. Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., & Westen, D. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Not gone, not forgotten, and not explained by alternative hypotheses. Psychological Science, 7, 373–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00392.x . · DOI
  6. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., Choe, J. C., Lim, H. K., Hasegawa, M., Hasegawa, T., & Bennett, K. (1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6, 121–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00215.x . · DOI
  7. Buunk, B., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7, 359–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00389.x . · DOI
  8. Dantzker, M. L., & Eisenman, R. (2005). Sexual attitudes among Hispanic students at a border university: Gender differences and failure to support Buss’s jealousy theory. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 26, 71–80.
  9. de Souza, A. A. L., Verderane, M. P., Taira, J. T., & Otta, E. (2006). Emotional and sexual jealousy as a function of sex and sexual orientation in a Brazilian sample. Psychological Reports, 98, 529–535. doi: 10.2466/PR0.98.2.529-535 . · DOI
  10. DeSteno, D. A., & Salovey, P. (1996). Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy? Questioning the “fitness” of the model. Psychological Science, 7, 367–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00391.x . · DOI
  11. Eisenman, R., & Dantzker, M. L. (2006). Gender and ethnic differences in sexual attitudes at a Hispanic-serving university. The Journal of General Psychology, 133, 153–162. doi: 10.3200/GENP.133.2.153-162 . · DOI
  12. Fernandez, A. M., Vera-Villarroel, P., Sierra, J. C., & Zubeidat, I. (2007). Distress in response to emotional and sexual infidelity: Evidence of evolved gender differences in Spanish students. The Journal of Psychology, 14, 17–24. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.141.1.17-24 . · DOI
  13. Geary, D. C., DeSoto, M. C., Hoard, M. K., Sheldon, M. S., & Cooper, M. L. (2001). Estrogens and relationship jealousy. Human Nature, 12, 299–320. doi: 10.1007/s12110-001-1001-2 . · DOI
  14. Grice, J. W., & Seely, E. (2000). The evolution of sex differences in jealousy: Failure to replicate previous results. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 348–356. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2284 . · DOI
  15. Harris, C. R. (2000). Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity: The specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1082–1091. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1082 . · DOI
  16. Harris, C. R. (2003a). Factors associated with jealousy over real and imagined infidelity: An examination of the social-cognitive and evolutionary psychology perspectives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 319–329. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00112 . · DOI
  17. Harris, C. R., & Christenfeld, N. (1996). Gender, jealousy, and reason. Psychological Science, 7, 364–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00390.x . · DOI
  18. Hupka, R. B., & Bank, A. L. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution or social construction? Cross-Cultural Research, 30, 24–59. doi: 10.1177/106939719603000102 . · DOI
  19. Kimeldorf, M. B. (2009). Reactions to infidelity: Individual, gender, and situational predictors of relationship outcome and forgiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 69(7-B), 4427.
  20. Levy, K. N., & Kelly, K. M. (2010). Sex differences in jealousy: A contribution from attachment theory. Psychological Science, 21, 166–173. doi: 10.1177/0956797609357708 . · DOI
  21. Mathes, E. W. (2005). Relationship between short-term sexual strategies and sexual jealousy. Psychological Reports, 96, 29–35. doi: 10.2466/pr0.96.1.29-35 . · DOI
  22. Miller, S. L., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Sex differences in response to sexual versus emotional infidelity: The role of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 287–291. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.013 . · DOI
  23. Murphy, M. M., Vallacher, R. R., Shackelford, T. K., Bjorklund, D. F., & Yunger, J. L. (2006). Relationship experience as a predictor of romantic jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 761–769. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.004 . · DOI
  24. Pietrzak, R. H., Laird, J. D., Stevens, D. A., & Thompson, N. S. (2002). Sex differences in human jealousy: A coordinated study of forced-choice, continuous rating-scale, and physiological responses on the same subjects. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 83–94. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00078-2 . · DOI
  25. Sagarin, B. J. (2005). Reconsidering evolved sex differences in jealousy: Comment on Harris (2003). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 62–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_5 . · DOI
  26. Sagarin, B. J., & Guadagno, R. E. (2004). Sex differences in the context of extreme jealousy. Personal Relationships, 11, 319–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00085.x . · DOI
  27. Sagarin, B. J., Becker, D. V., Guadagno, R. E., Nicastle, L. D., & Millevoi, A. (2003). Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy: The moderating influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 17–23. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00106-X . · DOI
  28. Schutzwohl, A. (2007). Decision strategies in continuous ratings of jealousy feelings elicited by sexual and emotional infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 815–828. Retrieved from http://www.epjournal.net/filestore/ep05815828.pdf . · DOI
  29. Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partner’s infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 299–307. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000202 . · DOI
  30. Sheets, V. L., & Wolfe, M. D. (2001). Sexual jealousy in heterosexuals, lesbians, and gays. Sex Roles, 44, 255–276. doi: 10.1023/A:1010996631863 . · DOI
  31. Takahashi, H., Matsuura, M., Yahata, N., Koeda, M., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2006). Men and women show distinct brain activations during imagery of sexual and emotional infidelity. NeuroImage, 32, 1299–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.049 . · DOI
  32. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
  33. Voracek, M. (2001). Marital status as a candidate moderator variable of male-female differences in sexual jealousy: The need for representative population samples. Psychological Reports, 88, 553–566. doi: 10.2466/PR0.88.2.553-566 . · DOI
  34. Wade, T. J., & Fowler, K. (2006). Sex differences in response to sexual and emotional infidelity: Considerations of rival attractiveness and financial status. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 37–50. doi: 10.1556/JCEP.4.2006.1.3 . · DOI
  35. Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1993). Gender differences in sexual jealousy: Adaptionist or social learning explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 115–140. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(93)90011-6 . · DOI
  36. Wiederman, M. W., & Kendall, E. (1999). Evolution, sex, and jealousy: Investigation with a sample from Sweden. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 121–128. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00046-4 . · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Varga, C. M., Gee, C. B., & Munro, G.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Towson University (US)
Corresponding author
Varga, Colleen M.
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2011-07-28
Volume
65
Issue
11-12
Pages
854-866
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W2106866492
Cited by
17
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
romantic jealousy, infidelity, sexual infidelity, emotional infidelity, gender differences, age differences, hypothetical scenarios, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Sample Characteristics and Experience with Infidelity on Romantic Jealousy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11199-011-0048-8
The paper
Varga, C. M., Gee, C. B., & Munro, G. (2011). The Effects of Sample Characteristics and Experience with Infidelity on Romantic Jealousy. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0048-8