Cited by 572LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender affirmation: a framework for conceptualizing risk behavior among transgender women of color.

Open access
Sevelius, Jae M.·2013·Sex Roles

Abstract

Experiences of stigma, discrimination, and violence as well as extreme health disparities and high rates of sexual risk behavior and substance use have been well-documented among transgender women of color. Using an intersectional approach and integrating prominent theories from stigma, eating disorders, and HIV-related research, this article offers a new framework for conceptualizing risk behavior among transgender women of color, specifically sexual risk behavior and risky body modification practices. This framework is centered on the concept of 'gender affirmation,' the process by which individuals are affirmed in their gender identity through social interactions. Qualitative data from 22 interviews with transgender women of color from the San Francisco Bay Area in the United States are analyzed and discussed in the context of the gender affirmation framework.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-012-0216-5

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lombardi, E., Wilchins, R., Priesing, D., & Malouf, D. (2001b). Gender violence: Transgender experiences with violence and discrimination. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 89–101. · DOI
  2. Sevelius, J. (2011). Developing a quantitative measure of gender affirmation to examine its relationship to health risk behavior among transgender women. Paper presented at the World Professional Association for Transgender Health Symposium, Atlanta, GA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sevelius, J. M.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Sevelius, Jae M.
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2012-09-30
Volume
68
Issue
11-12
Pages
675-689
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W1987404283
Cited by
572
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
FWCI
17.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH085566)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
gender affirmation, transgender women of color, sexual risk behavior, intersectionality, stigma, discrimination, HIV, eating disorders, substance use, health disparities, gender identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review