Cited by 415Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingQuality of Life Measurement

An Investigation into the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index

Lau, Anna L. D., Cummins, Robert A., Mcpherson, Wenda·2005·Social Indicators Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & Mcpherson, W.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lau, Anna L. D.
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Published
2005-07
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
403-430
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
OpenAlex
W2061781604
Cited by
415
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
Personal Wellbeing Index, subjective well-being, cross-cultural equivalence, Hong Kong Chinese, Australian population, response bias, psychometric validation, cross-cultural measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review