Cited by 440Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Life Satisfaction Across the Lifespan: Findings from Two Nationally Representative Panel Studies

Open access
Baird, Brendan M., Lucas, Richard E., Donnellan, M. Brent·2010·Social Indicators Research

Abstract

Two large-scale, nationally representative panel studies (the German Socio Economic Panel Study and the British Household Panel Study) were used to assess changes in life satisfaction over the lifespan. The cross-sectional and longitudinal features of these studies were used to isolate age-related changes from confounding factors including instrumentation effects and cohort effects. Although estimated satisfaction trajectories varied somewhat across studies, two consistent findings emerged. First, both studies show that life satisfaction does not decline over much of adulthood. Second, there is a steep decline in life satisfaction among those older than 70. The British data also showed a relatively large increase in satisfaction from the 40s to the early 70s. Thus, age differences in well-being can be quite large and deserve increased empirical and theoretical attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11205-010-9584-9

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Baltes PB 1968 Longitudinal and cross-sectional sequences in the study of age and generation effects Human Development 11 145 171 5663535
  2. Baltes PB Mayer KU 1999 The Berlin aging study: Aging from 70 to 100 Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press
  3. Costa PT Jr McCrae RR 1982 An approach to the attribution of aging, period, and cohort effects Psychological Bulletin 92 238 250
  4. Deaton A 2007 Income, aging, health and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll Cambridge, MA National Bureau of Economic Research (Working Paper No. 13317)
  5. Diener E Suh EM 1998 Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis Schaie KW Lawton MP Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Vol 17 Focus on emotion and adult development 304 324 New York Springer
  6. Hofer SM Sliwinski MJ 2006 Design and analysis of longitudinal studies on aging Birren JE Schaie KW Handbook of the psychology of aging 6th 15 37 New York Academic Press
  7. Inglehart R 1990 Culture shift in advanced industrial society Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
  8. Pinquart M 2001 Age differences in perceived positive affect, negative affect, and affect balance in middle and old age Journal of Happiness Studies 2 375 405

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lucas, Richard E.
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Published
2010-02-11
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
183-203
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
OpenAlex
W2065182777
Cited by
440
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
FWCI
18.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R03AG026028, R03AG028744)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
life satisfaction, lifespan development, age differences in well-being, subjective well-being, older adults, cohort effects, German Socio-Economic Panel, British Household Panel Survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review