CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 99Smart Cities and TechnologiesSustainable Urban and Rural DevelopmentQuality of Life Measurement

City Indicators on Social Sustainability as Standardization Technologies for Smarter (Citizen-Centered) Governance of Cities

Marsal-Llacuna, Maria-Lluïsa·2016·Social Indicators Research
DOI 10.1007/s11205-015-1075-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11205-015-1075-6

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smart and smarter cities have been subject to much debate and growing criticism questioning their added value to sustainability due to lack of incorporating fundamental goals of sustainable development and falling short in considering environmental and social indicators.

    “As discussed above, such cities have, irrespective of which ICT visions they tend to instantiate in relation to their operational functioning, management, planning, and development, been subject to much debate, generating a growing level of criticism that essentially questions their added value to sustainability due to the lack of incorporating the fundamental goals of sustainable development, as”

    From On the sustainability of smart and smarter cities in the era of big data: an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [92]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Marsal-Llacuna, M.-L.
Affiliations
Universitat de Girona (ES)
Corresponding author
Marsal-Llacuna, Maria-Lluïsa
ORCID
Marsal-Llacuna, Maria-Lluïsa
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-08-23
Volume
128
Issue
3
Pages
1193-1216
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
DOI
10.1007/s11205-015-1075-6
OpenAlex
W1629083621
Cited by
99
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Sustainable Urban and Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
smart cities, social sustainability, citizen-centric governance, standardization, citizenship rights, local governance, market standards, triple bottom line, urban policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review