The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although information criteria are computationally convenient, they are based on asymptotic results and assumptions about the data that may not always hold [89].”
From Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports (2018) · cites this paper as [89]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“WAIC is a more Bayesian approach to information criteria that adds a correction for the effective number of parameters [89].”
From Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports (2018) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033 · cited 1×
“There is also something called the Bayesian information criterion (a misleading name, we believe) that adjusts for the number of fitted parameters with a penalty that increases with the sample size, n (Schwarz 1978).”
BackgroundModel selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495 · cited 1×
“The log predictive density has an important role in statistical model comparison because of its connection to the Kullback-Leibler information measure (see Burnham and Anderson, 2002, and Robert, 1996).”
MethodGelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Self-citationPattern Recognition and Neural Networks
Ripley, B. D. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812651 · Cited by 6,500
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000001437 · Cited by 5,793 · cited 1×
“Examples include the quadratic, logarithmic, and zero-one scores, whose properties are reviewed by Gneiting and Raftery (2007).”
BackgroundGroot, M. D. (1970) · doi:10.2307/2987329 · Cited by 4,527 · cited 2×
“In this asymptotic limit, the posterior is dominated by the likelihood—the prior contributes only one factor, while the likelihood contributes n factors, one for each data point—and so the likelihood function also approaches the same normal distribution.”
BackgroundHoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118 · cited 1×
“When several candidate models are available, they can be compared and averaged using Bayes factors (which is equivalent to embedding them in a larger discrete model) or some more practical approximate procedure (Hoeting et al., 1999) or continuous model expansion (Draper, 1999).”
MethodInformation Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_38 · Cited by 3,028 · cited 5×
“For practical reasons alone, there remains a place for simple bias corrections such as AIC (Akaike, 1973), DIC (Spiegelhalter et al., 2002, van der Linde, 2005), and, more recently, WAIC (Watanabe, 2010), and all these can be viewed as approximations to different versions of cross-validation (Stone,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWatanabe, S. (2010) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.5555/1756006.1953045 · Cited by 2,921 · cited 5×
“Bayesian cross-validation works also with singular models, and Bayesian LOO-CV has been proven to asymptotically equal to WAIC (Watanabe, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn
Brix, A. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.00347_4.x · Cited by 2,588 · cited 3×
“As is well known in hierarchical modeling (see, e.g., Spiegelhalter et al. 2002; Gelman et al. 2003), the line separating prior distribution from likelihood is somewhat arbitrary and is related to the question of what aspects of the data will be changed in hypothetical replications.”
BackgroundBernardo, J. M., & Smith, A. F. M. (1994) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316870 · Cited by 2,178
Restrepo-Montoya, D. (2008) · doi:10.1007/3-540-28820-1_2 · Cited by 1,824 · cited 1×
“Bernardo and Smith (1994) argue that suitable scoring rules for prediction are proper and local: propriety of the scoring rule motivates the decision maker to report his or her beliefs honestly, and for local scoring rules predictions are judged only on the plausibility they assign to the event…”
BackgroundBayesianly Justifiable and Relevant Frequency Calculations for the Applied Statistician
Rubin, D. (1984) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346785 · Cited by 1,503 · cited 2×
“The fit of model to data can be assessed using posterior predictive checks (Rubin, 1984), prior predictive checks (when evaluating potential replications involving new parameter values), or, more generally, mixed checks for hierarchical models (Gelman, Meng, and Stern, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodBayesian Model Choice: Asymptotics and Exact Calculations
Gelfand, A., & Dey, D. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1994.tb01996.x · Cited by 1,399 · cited 1×
“In some ways, our paper is similar to the review article by Gelfand and Dey (1994), except that they were focused on model choice whereas our goal is more immediately to estimate predictive accuracy for the goal of model comparison.”
MethodFearn, T., Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., & Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533081 · Cited by 1,322
Self-citationAn asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross validation and Akaike's criterion
Stone, M. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01603.x · Cited by 1,286 · cited 2×
“…reasons alone, there remains a place for simple bias corrections such as AIC (Akaike, 1973), DIC (Spiegelhalter et al., 2002, van der Linde, 2005), and, more recently, WAIC (Watanabe, 2010), and all these can be viewed as approximations to different versions of cross-validation (Stone, 1977).”
MethodMaking and Evaluating Point Forecasts
Gneiting, T. (2011) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.r10138 · Cited by 1,174 · cited 3×
“We use the squared error as an example scoring function for point prediction, because the squared error and its derivatives seem to be the most common scoring functions in predictive literature (Gneiting, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Predictive Approach to Model Selection
Geisser, S., & Eddy, W. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481632 · Cited by 1,079
Deviance information criteria for missing data models
Celeux, G., Forbes, F., Robert, C., & Titterington, D. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba122 · Cited by 966 · cited 1×
“Various difficulties have been noted with DIC (see Celeux et al., 2006, Plummer, 2008, and much of the discussion of Spiegelhalter et al., 2002) but there has been no consensus on an alternative.”
BackgroundA widely applicable Bayesian information criterion
Watanabe, S. (2012) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.5555/2567709.2502609 · Cited by 963 · cited 1×
“Watanabe (2013) has also proposed a widely applicable Bayesian information criterion (WBIC) which works also in singular and unrealizable cases.”
BackgroundPhilosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics
Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2013) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x · Cited by 825
Self-citationExpected Information as Expected Utility
Bernardo, J. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344689 · Cited by 705 · cited 2×
“The logarithmic score is the unique (up to an affine transformation) local and proper scoring rule (Bernardo, 1979), and appears to be the most commonly used scoring rule in model selection.”
BackgroundBURMAN, P. (1989) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/76.3.503 · Cited by 634 · cited 2×
“For large n the difference is negligible, but for small n (or when using k-fold cross-validation) we can use a first order bias correction b by estimating how much better predictions would be obtained if conditioning on n data points (Burman, 1989):”
MethodPenalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison
Plummer, M. (2008) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm049 · Cited by 395 · cited 1×
“Various difficulties have been noted with DIC (see Celeux et al., 2006, Plummer, 2008, and much of the discussion of Spiegelhalter et al., 2002) but there has been no consensus on an alternative.”
BackgroundA survey of Bayesian predictive methods for model assessment, selection and comparison
Vehtari, A., & Ojanen, J. (2012) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/12-ss102 · Cited by 366 · cited 5×
“There are extensions of AIC which have an adjustment related to the effective number of parameters (see Vehtari and Ojanen, 2012, section 5.5, and references therein) but these are seldom used due to stability problems and computational difficulties, issues that have motivated the construction of the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEstimation in Parallel Randomized Experiments
Rubin, D. B. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986006004377 · Cited by 269 · cited 3×
“From Rubin (1981).”
MethodInfluentialA cross-validatory method for dependent data
Burman, P., Chow, E., & Nolan, D. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.2.351 · Cited by 245 · cited 4×
“Regular cross-validation and information criteria can be used for time series in case of stationary Markov process and squared error or a scoring function or rule which is well approximated by a quadratic form (Akaike, 1973, Burman et al., 1994).”
MethodInfluentialThe direct use of likelihood for significance testing
Dempster, A. P. (1997) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1018598421607 · Cited by 220 · cited 1×
“Figure 2 is reminiscent of the direct likelihood methods of Dempster (1974) and Aitkin (2010).”
MethodBayesian Model Assessment and Comparison Using Cross-Validation Predictive Densities
Vehtari, A., & Lampinen, J. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/08997660260293292 · Cited by 198 · cited 3×
“A practical estimate of related sampling uncertainty can be obtained by analyzing the variation in the expected log predictive densities ̂ elppdi using parametric or nonparametric approaches (Vehtari and Lampinen, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMcCulloch, R. (1989) · doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478793 · Cited by 192 · cited 2×
“One way to understand such differences is to calibrate based on simpler models (McCulloch, 1989).”
MethodStatistical aspects of model selection
Shibata, R. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75007-6_5 · Cited by 155 · cited 2×
“DIC is a variation of the regularized information criteria which have been shown to be asymptotically equal to LOO-CV using plug-in predictive densities (Shibata 1989).”
MethodBayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353 · Cited by 151 · cited 5×
“For practical reasons alone, there remains a place for simple bias corrections such as AIC (Akaike, 1973), DIC (Spiegelhalter et al., 2002, van der Linde, 2005), and, more recently, WAIC (Watanabe, 2010), and all these can be viewed as approximations to different versions of cross-validation (Stone,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLinde, A. (2005) · Statistica Neerlandica · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.2005.00278.x · Cited by 151 · cited 1×
“For practical reasons alone, there remains a place for simple bias corrections such as AIC (Akaike, 1973), DIC (Spiegelhalter et al., 2002, van der Linde, 2005), and, more recently, WAIC (Watanabe, 2010), and all these can be viewed as approximations to different versions of cross-validation (Stone,…”
MethodStatistical Inference: An Integrated Bayesian/Likelihood Approach
Aitkin, M. (2010) · doi:10.1201/ebk1420093438 · Cited by 69 · cited 2×
“So, in this case, DIC and AIC are the same.”
BackgroundMethodRobert, C. P. (1996) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/bf00133173 · Cited by 59 · cited 4×
“Regular cross-validation and information criteria can be used for time series in case of stationary Markov process and squared error or a scoring function or rule which is well approximated by a quadratic form (Akaike, 1973, Burman et al., 1994).”
MethodInfluentialPredictive likelihood for Bayesian model selection and averaging
Ando, T., & Tsay, R. (2010) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.08.001 · Cited by 57 · cited 1×
“Ando and Tsay (2010) have proposed an information criterion for the joint prediction, but its bias correction has the same computational difficulties as many other extensions of AIC and it can not be compared to cross-validation, since it is not possible to leave n data points out in the…”
BackgroundImplications of the ‘bread and peace’ model for the 2008 US presidential election
Hibbs, D. (2008) · doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9333-7 · Cited by 47 · cited 1×
“It is based on the ‘bread and peace’ model created by political scientist Douglas Hibbs (see Hibbs, 2008, for a recent review) to forecast elections based solely on economic growth (with corrections for wartime, notably Adlai Stevenson’s exceptionally poor performance in 1952 and Hubert Humphrey’s…”
Jones, H. E., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2012) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2011.01019.x · Cited by 16 · cited 2×
“Hence the plan is to like to start with (5) and then apply some sort of bias correction to get a reasonable estimate of (2).”
BackgroundRejoinder to discussion of 'Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics'.
Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. (2013) · British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02066.x · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Draper, D.: Model uncertainty yes, discrete model averaging maybe. Stat. Sci. 14, 405–409 (1999)
- Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York (1993) · DOI · Paper page
- Gelman, A., Meng, X.L., Stern, H.S.: Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies (with discussion). Stat. Sin. 6, 733–807 (1996)
- Watanabe, S.: Algebraic Geometry and Statistical Learning Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bayesian Computing with INLA: A Review
Rue, H., Riebler, A., Sørbye, S. H., Illian, J. B., Simpson, D. P., & Lindgren, F. K. (2017) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054045 · Cited by 737
Young, A. L., Marinescu, R. V., Oxtoby, N. P., Bocchetta, M., Yong, K., Firth, N. C., Cash, D. M., Thomas, D. L., Dick, K. M., Cardoso, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05892-0 · Cited by 596
Socioeconomic status determines COVID-19 incidence and related mortality in Santiago, Chile
Mena, G. E., Martinez, P. P., Mahmud, A. S., Marquet, P. A., Buckee, C. O., & Santillana, M. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg5298 · Cited by 431
Practical advice on variable selection and reporting using Akaike information criterion
Sutherland, C. S., Hare, D., Johnson, P. J., Linden, D. W., Montgomery, R. A., & Dröge, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.1261 · Cited by 250
Impacts of Neanderthal-Introgressed Sequences on the Landscape of Human Gene Expression
McCoy, R. C., Wakefield, J., & Akey, J. M. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.038 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Gelman, A., Hwang, J., & Vehtari, A.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Gelman, Andrew
- Venue
- Statistics and Computing
- Published
- 2013-08-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 997-1016
- ISSN
- 0960-3174 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1375
- OpenAlex
- W2130902307
- Cited by
- 2,104
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 153 · 2025: 202 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 227 · 2021: 266 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 154 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 45.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Statistics and Computing (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Institute of Education Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- information criteria, Akaike information criterion, deviance information criterion, Bayesian model selection, out-of-sample prediction error, bias correction, model comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review