Cited by 1,286Statistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods and ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

An asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross validation and Akaike's criterion

Stone, M.·1977·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

Abstract

Summary A logarithmic assessment of the performance of a predicting density is found to lead to asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross-validation and Akaike's criterion, when maximum likelihood estimation is used within each model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01603.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stone, M.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Stone, M.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)
Published
1977-09-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
44-47
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W55848811
Cited by
1,286
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 51
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
model selection, cross-validation, Akaike information criterion, asymptotic equivalence, predictive density, maximum likelihood estimation, logarithmic loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review