Cited by 180Misinformation and Its ImpactsSpam and Phishing DetectionHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

DeepFakE: improving fake news detection using tensor decomposition-based deep neural network

Kaliyar, Rohit Kumar, Goswami, Anurag, Narang, Pratik·2021·The Journal of Supercomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11227-020-03294-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combined content and context approach gives better results for fake news detection.

    “Results show the combined content and context approach gives better results.”

    From Deepfakes: current and future trends (2024) · cites this paper as Kaliyar et al. 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaliyar, R. K., Goswami, A., & Narang, P.
Affiliations
  • Bennett University (IN)
  • Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN)
Corresponding author
Narang, Pratik
Venue
The Journal of Supercomputing
Published
2020-05-05
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
1015-1037
ISSN
  • 0920-8542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0484
OpenAlex
W3022024046
Cited by
180
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 4
FWCI
33.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Supercomputing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
fake news detection, tensor decomposition, social media, echo chambers, social environment, news content, user profiles, news credibility, deepfakes, XGBoost ensemble

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review