Impact of packet loss and delay variation on the quality of real-time video streaming
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · see citing works
Handbook of Image and Video Processing
Bovik, A. C. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-119792-6.x5062-1 · Cited by 1,585 · see citing works
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
van de Gronde, J. J., Roerdink, J. B. T. M., & Member, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.83 · Cited by 1,308 · see citing works
Signal Processing: Image Communication
Iosifidis, A., Tefas, A., Pitas, I., et al. (2018) · Cited by 1,124 · see citing works
Objective Video Quality Assessment Methods: A Classification, Review, and Performance Comparison
Chikkerur, S., Sundaram, V., Martin Reisslein, B., & Karam, L. J. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · doi:10.1109/tbc.2011.2104671 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Handbook of Image and Video Processing (Communications, Networking and Multimedia)
Bovik, A. C. (2005) · Academic Press, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Packet Loss Recovery for Streaming Video
Feamster, N., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002) · Cited by 160 · see citing works
TCP/IP Performance over 3G Wireless Links with Rate and Delay Variation
Chan, M. C., & Ramjee, R. (2005) · Wireless Networks · doi:10.1007/s11276-004-4748-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Evaluation of temporal variation of video quality in packet loss networks
Yim, C., & Bovik, A. C. (2010) · Signal Processing Image Communication · doi:10.1016/j.image.2010.11.002 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Impact of H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC Compression Standards on the Video Quality for 4K Resolution
Uhrina, M., Frnda, J., Sevcik, L., et al. (2014) · Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering · doi:10.15598/aeee.v12i4.1216 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationComparison of Video Quality Metrics on Multimedia Videos
Loke, M. H., Ong, E. P., Lin, W., et al. (2006) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2006.312492 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Effective Packet Loss Estimation on VoIP Jitter Buffer
Vozn̆ák, M., Kováč, A., & Halas, M. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30039-4_21 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Coding efficiency comparison of new video coding standards: HEVC vs VP9 vs AVS2 video
Kim, I.-K., Lee, S., Piao, Y., et al. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo workshops · doi:10.1109/icmew.2014.6890700 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Correlation between Objective and Subjective Methods Used for Video Quality Evaluation
Uhrina, M., Hlubík, J., & Vaculík, M. (2013) · Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering · doi:10.15598/aeee.v11i2.775 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
QoE prediction model for multimedia services in IP network applying queuing policy
Sevcik, L., Vozn̆ák, M., & Frnda, J. (2014) · International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1109/spects.2014.6879998 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationImpact of Compression on the Video Quality
Uhrina, M., Hlubík, J., & Vaculík, M. (2012) · Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering · doi:10.15598/aeee.v10i4.737 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey
Barakabitze, A. A., Barman, N., Ahmad, A., Zadtootaghaj, S., Sun, L., Martini, M. G., & Atzori, L. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2958784 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
- Authors
- Frnda, J., Voznak, M., & Sevcik, L.
- Affiliations
- VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ)
- Venue
- Telecommunication Systems
- Published
- 2015-04-17
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-275
- ISSN
- 1018-4864 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9451
- OpenAlex
- W2153575016
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Telecommunication Systems (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Regional Development Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multimedia Communication and Technology
- Keywords
- live streaming, packet loss, jitter, video quality, quality of service, triple play services, IP networks, objective video quality metrics, QoS models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
