The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prior knowledge activation: how different concept mapping tasks lead to substantial differences in cognitive processes, learning outcomes, and perceived self-efficacy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“research suggests that pre-constructed concept maps are more effective as pre-training for learners with lower prior knowledge than having them create their own (Gurlitt and Renkl, 2008; Gurlitt and Renkl, 2010).”
From Rethinking pre-training: cognitive load implications for learners with varying prior knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Gurlitt and Renkl, 2010
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Kytle, J., & Bandura, A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065952 · Cited by 25,422
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,451
Handbook of research on teaching
Wittrock, M. C. (1986) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 10,630
Pierce, W. D., & Bandura, A. (1977) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/3340496 · Cited by 9,742
Bandura, A. (1977) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15521699 · Cited by 7,585
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363 · Cited by 5,298
Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,203
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education, Vol. 4: Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
- Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1992). Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning: The use of prior knowledge state tests and knowledge profiles. Utrecht: Lemma B.V.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Butcher, K. R. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.010 · Cited by 331
The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy
Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Bridgeman, A. J., WALKER, R. A., Sharma, M. D., & Smith, L. D. (2015) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.999319 · Cited by 367
The impact of service robots in retail: Exploring the effect of novelty priming on consumer behavior
Wang, Y., Kang, Q., Zhou, S., Dong, Y., & Liu, J. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103002 · Cited by 113
Hattan, C., Alexander, P. A., & Lupo, S. M. (2024) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543221148478 · Cited by 90
Watson, S. M. R., Gable, R. A., Gear, S. B., & Hughes, K. C. (2012) · Learning Disabilities Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00353.x · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gurlitt, Johannes
- ORCID
- Renkl, Alexander
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2009-01-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 417-433
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W2022556519
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- concept mapping, prior knowledge activation, cognitive processes, elaboration, model development, think-aloud, learning outcomes, self-efficacy, coherence effects, hypertext learning, economics education, meteorology education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
