Cited by 135EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer

Aghaie, Reza, Zhang, Lawrence Jun·2012·Instructional Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Anderson, N. J. (2002b). Using telescopes, microscopes, and kaleidoscopes to put metacognition into perspective. TESOL Matters, 12, 1–3.
  2. Byrd, E. H. (1999). Paired college study-reading courses: An investigation of the effectiveness of a reduced credit metacognitive model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, Utah.
  3. Byrd, E. H., Carter, E. C., & Waddoups, S. D. (2001). Taking control of your college reading and learning. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
  4. Chamot, A. U. (1994). A Model for Learning Strategies Instruction in the Foreign language Classroom. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on linguistics and applied linguistics (pp. 323–326). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  5. Greenfell, M., & Macaro, E. (2007). Claims and critiques. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 9–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Kellerman, E. (1991). Compensatory strategies in second language research: A critique, a revision and some non-implications for the classroom. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign and second language pedagogy research. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  7. Nelson, J. (1977). Nelson language proficiency test. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Richards, J. C., Hull, J., & Proctor, S. (2003). New interchange, book 3: Teachers’ edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thoughts and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  10. Zhang, Z. H., & Zhang, L. J. (2011). Developing and validating a listening comprehension problems scale for enhancing Chinese university students’ metacognitive awareness of L2 listening. Journal of Asia TEFL, 8, 318–335.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–133 of 133

Metadata

Authors
Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Urmia University (IR)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Lawrence Jun
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2012-01-06
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
1063-1081
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2057194314
Cited by
135
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
47.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
explicit instruction, reading strategies, cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies, strategy transfer, reading comprehension, EFL reading, strategy-based instruction, Iranian EFL learners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review