Cited by 2,771EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition

O'Malley, J. Michael, Chamot, Anna Uhl·1990·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

O'Malley and Chamot review the literature on learning strategies, describe and classify learning strategies in second language learning, and discuss why learning is affected in a positive manner when such strategies are used. The authors present instructional models for learning-strategy training that teachers can apply to their own classes. The material is based on current research in second language acquisition and cognitive theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139524490

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U.
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
1990-02-23
OpenAlex
W4300940136
Cited by
2,771
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 149 · 2023: 221 · 2022: 241 · 2021: 182 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 182 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 152 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 110 · 2013: 106 · 2012: 120
FWCI
63.81
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
learning strategies, second language acquisition, strategy training, teaching model, cognitive theory, strategy classification, language learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review