Moving from recitation to open-format literature discussion in Chinese classrooms
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dialogic approaches benefitted teachers' beliefs and their practices in reading instructions.
“dialogic approaches benefitted teachers' beliefs and their practices in reading instructions (e.g., Cheng et al. 2015;Sun, Zhang, and Li 2020;Wei, Murphy, and Wu 2020).”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. 2015
Despite the IRE/IRF format being efficient for students to learn factual knowledge and basic skills, it restricts students' opportunities to engage in elaborating, adding complexity, and going beyond the given.
“Despite the IRE/IRF format of discussion being efficient for students to learn factual knowledge and basic skills (Cheng et al. 2015), it restricts students' opportunities to get involved in processes of 'elaborating, adding complexity, and going beyond the given' (Magirius, Steinmetz, and Scherf 2023, 2).”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. 2015
Peer-led, open-format discussion approaches were successful in raising Chinese students' reading comprehension skills.
“peer-led, open-format discussion approaches were successful in raising Chinese students' reading comprehension skills”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. 2015
Chinese reading instruction relies heavily on official textbooks to ensure the Curriculum Guide is followed.
“Chinese reading instruction relies heavily on official textbooks to ensure the Curriculum Guide is followed (Cheng et al. 2015;Zhang, Wijekumar, and Han 2021).”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. 2015
Most prescribed texts in Chinese primary textbooks are not dialogic, leaving students with fewer opportunities to provide multiple interpretations of text content.
“Most prescribed texts in Chinese primary textbooks are not dialogic, leaving students with fewer opportunities to provide multiple interpretations of text content (Cheng et al. 2015).”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. 2015
An interesting topic is important in fostering Chinese children's comprehension and influencing students' discussion.
“Prior studies have identified the importance of an interesting topic in fostering Chinese children's comprehension and influencing students' discussion (e.g., Cheng et al. 2015).”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. 2015
Under the IRE/IRF talk format, the teacher takes primary responsibility for initiating questions and evaluating students' responses against known-answer questions in regular reading lessons.
“Under the IRE/IRF talk format, the teacher take primary responsibility for initiating questions and evaluating students' responses against known-answer questions in regular reading lessons (Cheng et al. 2015;Sun, Zhang, and Li 2020).”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts
Zhong, Y., Davies, M., & Wilson, A. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12816 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Li, H., Anderson, R., Ding, F., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Shu, H., & Wu, X.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Western Kentucky University (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Hong
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2015-09-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 643-664
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W1825059576
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Key Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education (11JZD041)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- collaborative reasoning, literary conversation, reading comprehension, peer-led discussion, recitation, teacher learning, fourth grade, student discourse, teacher discourse, reading instruction, teacher reflection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review