Cited by 11Reading and Literacy DevelopmentEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Moving from recitation to open-format literature discussion in Chinese classrooms

Cheng, Yahua, Zhang, Jie, Li, Hong, Anderson, Richard, Ding, Fengjiao, Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim, Shu, Hua, Wu, Xinchun·2015·Instructional Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11251-015-9358-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dialogic approaches benefitted teachers' beliefs and their practices in reading instructions.

    “dialogic approaches benefitted teachers' beliefs and their practices in reading instructions (e.g., Cheng et al. 2015;Sun, Zhang, and Li 2020;Wei, Murphy, and Wu 2020).”
  • Despite the IRE/IRF format being efficient for students to learn factual knowledge and basic skills, it restricts students' opportunities to engage in elaborating, adding complexity, and going beyond the given.

    “Despite the IRE/IRF format of discussion being efficient for students to learn factual knowledge and basic skills (Cheng et al. 2015), it restricts students' opportunities to get involved in processes of 'elaborating, adding complexity, and going beyond the given' (Magirius, Steinmetz, and Scherf 2023, 2).”
  • Peer-led, open-format discussion approaches were successful in raising Chinese students' reading comprehension skills.

    “peer-led, open-format discussion approaches were successful in raising Chinese students' reading comprehension skills”
  • Chinese reading instruction relies heavily on official textbooks to ensure the Curriculum Guide is followed.

    “Chinese reading instruction relies heavily on official textbooks to ensure the Curriculum Guide is followed (Cheng et al. 2015;Zhang, Wijekumar, and Han 2021).”
  • Most prescribed texts in Chinese primary textbooks are not dialogic, leaving students with fewer opportunities to provide multiple interpretations of text content.

    “Most prescribed texts in Chinese primary textbooks are not dialogic, leaving students with fewer opportunities to provide multiple interpretations of text content (Cheng et al. 2015).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Li, H., Anderson, R., Ding, F., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Shu, H., & Wu, X.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Western Kentucky University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Hong
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2015-09-01
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
643-664
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W1825059576
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Key Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education (11JZD041)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
collaborative reasoning, literary conversation, reading comprehension, peer-led discussion, recitation, teacher learning, fourth grade, student discourse, teacher discourse, reading instruction, teacher reflection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review