The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statement of American Social Scientists of Research on School Desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lower public funds perpetuate reduced opportunities, lower quality and devalue housing, and lower adult income, subsequently creating and maintaining racial wealth inequity (Massey & Fischer, 2000; Orfield et al., 2008).”
From On race, human variation, and who gets and dies of sepsis (2022) · cites this paper as Orfield et al., 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Racism and health: evidence and needed research
Williams, D. R., Lawrence, J. A., & Davis, B. A. (2019) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043750 · Cited by 2,398
Racism and Health II: A Needed Research Agenda for Effective Interventions
Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213487341 · Cited by 189
“Racially integrated schools enhance SES because they are associated with higher graduation rates from high school, greater diversity of disciplinary training in higher education, higher incomes for minorities, and greater access to networks with links to educational and employment opportunities (Orfield et al., 2008).”
BackgroundOn race, human variation, and who gets and dies of sepsis
Brinkworth, J. F., & Shaw, J. G. (2022) · American Journal of Biological Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24527 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Orfield, G., Frankenberg, E., & Garces, L. M.
- Venue
- The Urban Review
- Published
- 2008-01-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 96-136
- ISSN
- 0042-0972
- 1573-1960
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statement of American Social Scientists of Research on School Desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11256-007-0073-7
- The paper
- Orfield, G., Frankenberg, E., & Garces, L. M. (2008). Statement of American Social Scientists of Research on School Desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County. The Urban Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0073-7
