What Makes Good Synthetic Training Data for Learning Disparity and Optical Flow Estimation?
Open accessAbstract
The finding that very large networks can be trained efficiently and reliably has led to a paradigm shift in computer vision from engineered solutions to learning formulations. As a result, the research challenge shifts from devising algorithms to creating suitable and abundant training data for supervised learning. How to efficiently create such training data? The dominant data acquisition method in visual recognition is based on web data and manual annotation. Yet, for many computer vision problems, such as stereo or optical flow estimation, this approach is not feasible because humans cannot manually enter a pixel-accurate flow field. In this paper, we promote the use of synthetically generated data for the purpose of training deep networks on such tasks. We suggest multiple ways to generate such data and evaluate the influence of dataset properties on the performance and generalization properties of the resulting networks. We also demonstrate the benefit of learning schedules that use different types of data at selected stages of the training process.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper analyzes what properties of synthetic training data matter for deep optical flow and disparity networks, using procedurally generated and manually modeled datasets. It finds that diversity and learning schedules matter more than realism, and that modeling camera artifacts can improve real-data performance.
Key findings
- Training on 22k FlyingChairs samples outperformed training on 908 Sintel samples and on the more sophisticated FlyingThings3D and Monkaa datasets on Sintel/KITTI/FlyingChairs (e.g., Sintel EPE 5.73 vs 6.42, 6.64, and 8.47, respectively).
- Sequential training FlyingChairs → FlyingThings3D gave the best Sintel train clean EPE of 4.05 under S_fine, better than a 1:1 mixture (4.25) or the reverse order (4.60), showing that simpler data first helps.
- Realistic lighting was not necessary: a network trained with static lighting achieved 4.16 on Sintel vs 4.22 for dynamic lighting and 4.41 for shadeless; dynamic lighting could confuse the network on non-dynamically lit test objects.
- Modeling camera artifacts helped: Bayer-interpolation degradation improved the KITTI 2015 score by 5% (1.62 to 1.54; KITTI2012 best-case 1.28), and full augmentation yielded 4.60 on Sintel vs 7.66 without augmentation, allowing a ∼100-fold reduction in training data.
Methods
- Generated synthetic datasets: FlyingChairs (2D affine chairs on Flickr backgrounds), FlyingThings3D (3D Blender rendering with ShapeNet objects and scene flow), Monkaa (open-source movie assets), Driving (KITTI-like), plus ablations on object shape/motion, textures, displacement statistics, lighting, and augmentation.
- Trained FlowNetC/FlowNet2-c for optical flow and DispNetCorr1D for disparity; typically 600k mini-batch iterations with batch size 4 and the S_short schedule, with S_long/S_fine for multi-dataset schedules.
- Evaluated average endpoint error (EPE) on Sintel clean, KITTI 2015, and FlyingChairs, and tested camera degradations including lens distortion/blur and Bayer-interpolation artifacts.
Limitations
- Stated: due to time and compute constraints, not all experiments were run on both optical flow and disparity; the authors assume disparity results likely apply to optical flow and vice versa. The findings may not hold for high-level tasks such as object recognition.
- Stated: there is no single best general-purpose training dataset; training data can be improved if the target domain is known. Synthetic FlyingThings3D data cannot teach disparity priors for KITTI street scenes.
- Evident: conclusions are tied to specific architectures (FlowNet/DispNet variants) and benchmarks (Sintel, KITTI 2015, FlyingChairs); KITTI ground truth is sparse and has gaps along object contours, limiting evaluation of boundary details.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 22 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
The data does not have to be realistic to make for a good training dataset.
“For instance, the data does not have to be realistic to make for a good training dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
Enabling more realism in the data via complex lighting does not necessarily help even if the test data is realistically lit.
“enabling more realism in the data via complex lighting does not necessarily help even if the test data is realistically lit”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
Simulating the flaws of a real camera during training improves network performance on images from such cameras.
“simulating the flaws of a real camera during training improves network performance on images from such cameras.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ What Makes Good Synthetic Training Data for Learning Disparity and Optical Flow Estimation? · p. 1
Learning schedules that use different types of data at selected stages of the training process are beneficial.
“We also demonstrate the benefit of learning schedules that use different types of data at selected stages of the training process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
The simplistic 2D FlyingChairs dataset yields good data to start training a network for optical flow estimation.
“In fact, our simplistic 2D FlyingChairs dataset yields good data to start training a network for optical flow estimation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingreasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
The network trained with dynamic lighting performs marginally worse on Sintel than the network trained with static lighting.
“This can also explain why this network performs marginally worse on Sintel than the network trained with static lighting”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 10
Training on scaling motion helps on KITTI.
“The dominant motion in KITTI is scaling motion induced by the scene moving towards the camera. Thus, training on scaling motion helps in this case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The dominant motion in KITTI is scaling motion induced by the scene moving towards the camera.
- Findingown data§ 5.2 What makes a good training dataset? · p. 9
Training on the more diverse and more realistic FlyingThings3D dataset yields inferior performance to training on FlyingChairs.
“Interestingly, Table 2 also shows that training on the more diverse and more realistic FlyingThings3D dataset yields inferior performance to training on FlyingChairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 9
More complexity and diversity in shapes and motion during training improves the performance of the resulting networks.
“As expected, the general trend is that more complexity and diversity in the shapes and motion during training improves the performance of the resulting networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
The network trained with dynamic lighting gets confused by objects that have not been generated with dynamic lighting.
“The results also show that the network trained with dynamic lighting gets confused by objects that have not been generated with dynamic lighting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
The network can exploit more complex lighting in the training data to perform better on test data.
“The results in Table 8 show that the network can exploit more complex lighting in the training data to perform better on test data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
A network trained on realistic dynamic lighting also expects realistic lighting in the test data.
“A network trained on realistic dynamic lighting also expects realistic lighting in the test data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14
The best results from combining datasets only hold if the datasets are used separately and in the specific order of training on FlyingChairs first and then fine-tuning on FlyingThings3D.
“this only holds if the datasets are used separately and in the specific order of training on FlyingChairs first and then fine-tuning on FlyingThings3D.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14
Using a combination of FlyingChairs and FlyingThings3D training data yields the best results.
“using a combination of FlyingChairs and FlyingThings3D training data yields the best results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 9
Holes in objects are counter-productive, weakening results on Sintel and KITTI.
“Holes in objects seem to be counter-productive, perhaps because objects in benchmark datasets rarely have holes.”
- Also stated in: § 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 10 · plain
“On the other hand, the chairs contain holes whereas training with holes in objects weakens the results on Sintel and KITTI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 10 · plain
- Findingown data§ 5.2.3 Displacement statistics · p. 12
The statistics of the displacement size of the FlyingChairs dataset match the statistics of the Sintel dataset fairly closely.
“The statistics of the displacement size of the FlyingChairs dataset matches the statistics of the Sintel dataset fairly closely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 9
Even the simplest dataset consisting of translated axis-aligned rectangles leads to reasonable performance on the benchmark datasets.
“Even the simplest dataset consisting of translated axis-aligned rectangles leads to reasonable performance on the benchmark datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4.2 Bayer-interpolation artifacts · p. 16
Our degraded data improves the KITTI 2015 score by 5%.
“Our degraded data improves the KITTI 2015 score by 5%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
The FlyingThings3D dataset leads to a network that is inferior to one trained on FlyingChairs on Sintel.
“the FlyingThings3D dataset, which comes with realistic lighting and many object categories, leads to a network that is inferior to one trained on FlyingChairs.”
- Also stated in: § 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14 · plain
“The results from Table 2 in Section 5.2 show that training a network on the FlyingThings3D dataset (Ilg et al, 2017) yields worse results on Sintel than training the same network on FlyingChairs (Dosovitskiy et al, 2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ilg et al, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dosovitskiy et al, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14 · plain
- Findingown data§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 9
Nonrigid deformations on objects and background lead to the overall best result.
“Nonrigid deformations on objects and background lead to the overall best result.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4.2 Bayer-interpolation artifacts · p. 17
Degraded training data produces better results than the artifact-free original data.
“The accompanying table shows that degraded training data produces better results than the artifact-free original data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4.1 Lens distortion and blur · p. 16
Training on artificially degraded data produces much finer details in disparity maps, especially towards image boundaries where lens distortion has the largest effect.
“training on artificially degraded data produces much finer details, especially in areas towards the image boundaries, where the lens distortion has the largest effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.3 Data augmentation · p. 7
The two types of augmentation, color and geometry, offer complementary benefits.
“Our experiments indicate that the two types offer complementary benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The learning algorithm is unable to filter out the small changes introduced by data augmentation and instead perceives the modified data as actual new data with new information.
- Findingreasoning§ 3.2.2 Driving · p. 6
The Driving dataset replicates the rough semantic structure of a typical KITTI scene.
“While the dataset does not make much sense on a high level (there are no road signs, traffic light situations, or pedestrians crossing the road), it does replicate the rough semantic structure of a typical KITTI scene.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 14
Even with infinite data, networks without augmentation perform far worse.
“However, even with infinite data, networks without augmentation perform far worse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 5.2 What makes a good training dataset? · p. 9
Training on the Driving dataset works best for KITTI.
“As expected, training on the Driving dataset works best for KITTI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.5 Data augmentation · p. 14
Almost all types of data augmentation are complementary and important to improve the performance of the network.
“The evaluation shows that almost all types of data augmentation are complementary and important to improve the performance of the network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 14
A FlowNet trained without data augmentation gets much greater relative benefits from more training data, compared to augmented training.
“A FlowNet trained without data augmentation gets much greater relative benefits from more training data, compared to augmented training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.3 Displacement statistics · p. 12
The more the displacement histogram differs from Sintel's, the worse a trained network performs on Sintel.
“The more the histogram differs from Sintel's, the worse a trained network performs on Sintel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.6 Amount of training data · p. 14
Randomized augmentation yields another huge improvement even for an infinite amount of training samples.
“randomized augmentation yields another huge improvement even for an infinite amount of training samples”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 What makes a good training dataset? · p. 9
The Sintel dataset is too small to yield great performance.
“The Sintel dataset, although very similar to its validation set, is too small to yield great performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 9
For the Sintel dataset, except for the addition of holes into objects, each additional level of complexity slightly improves performance.
“This can be best seen for the Sintel dataset, where, except for the addition of holes into objects, each additional level of complexity slightly improves the performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 What makes a good training dataset? · p. 8
A network trained on the 22k samples of the FlyingChairs training split performs better on Sintel validation than a network trained on a 908-sample subset of Sintel training.
“In fact, Table 2 shows that a network trained on the 22 k samples of the training split of the FlyingChairs dataset performs better than a network trained on a subset of the Sintel training dataset with 908 samples and tested on the remaining 133 samples for validation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14
Displacement statistics cannot be the only reason for the inferior performance of FlyingThings3D over FlyingChairs.
“Table 7 shows that the displacement statistics cannot be the only reason for the inferior performance of FlyingThings3D over FlyingChairs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
A 1:1 static/dynamic lighting mixture does not perform better.
“A 1:1 static/dynamic mixture does not perform better.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.4.1 Lens distortion and blur · p. 16
The network trained on degraded data makes more sensible guesses for areas occluded in the other view.
“The network even makes more sensible guesses for areas which are occluded in the other view”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.4.1 Lens distortion and blur · p. 16
The notable degradation of images produced by a Bumblebee stereo camera is due to radial blur, general blur, and over-saturated colors.
“The notable degradation of images produced by a Bumblebee 6 stereo camera is due to radial blur (caused by undistortion from a wide-angle lens), some general blur, and over-saturated colors ( i.e . strong contrast).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14
FlyingThings3D has much fewer small displacements (smaller than 5 pixels).
“Fig. 5 reveals that FlyingThings3D has much fewer small displacements (smaller than 5 pixels).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 What makes a good training dataset? · p. 9
The FlyingChairs dataset yields consistently better numbers than the more sophisticated FlyingThings3D and Monkaa datasets.
“Surprisingly, the FlyingChairs datasets yields consistently better numbers than the more sophisticated FlyingThings3D and Monkaa datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5.4.2 Bayer-interpolation artifacts · p. 17
Training with ground truth data from the target domain still yields the best results.
“The (rarely possible) best-case scenario of training with ground truth data from the target domain still yields the best results”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ 2 Related Work · p. 3
There has been relatively little work on analyzing which properties of synthetic training data help generalization to real data.
“There has been relatively little work on analyzing which properties of synthetic training data help generalization to real data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Su et al (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Movshovitz-Attias et al (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhang et al (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
For optical flow estimation, it is not obvious how to derive ground truth for large sets of real videos.
“In case of optical flow estimation, for instance, it is not obvious how to derive ground truth for large sets of real videos.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given§ 3.1.2 Synthetic 3D data for optical flow, disparity and scene flow: FlyingThings3D · p. 5
The modified Blender rendering engine directly produces fully dense and accurate ground truth for depth, disparity, optical flow and object segmentation for both views of a virtual stereo camera.
“We modified its internal rendering engine to directly produce fully dense and accurate ground truth for depth, disparity, optical flow and object segmentation (among others), all for both views of a virtual stereo camera.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
The size of existing real datasets for optical flow is far from what is needed to train a powerful deep network.
“This is far from what is needed to train a powerful deep network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1.1 2D image pairs for optical flow: FlyingChairs · p. 4
Successful generalization to real data indicates that the estimation of point correspondences can be learned from abstract data.
“We chose chairs because: (a) flying chairs offer nowhere near the semantic content of real-world scenes (thus, successful generalization to real data indicates that the estimation of point correspondences can be learned from abstract data) and (b) chairs have non-convex shapes with fine structure and are topologically diverse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
Creating training data for optical flow and disparity estimation requires a different approach than visual recognition, where web data with manual annotation can yield large datasets with reasonable effort.
“Creating data for such tasks requires a different approach than in visual recognition, where web data in conjunction with manual annotation by mostly untrained persons can yield large datasets with reasonable time and monetary effort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning§ 3.1.1 2D image pairs for optical flow: FlyingChairs · p. 4
Since all transformation parameters are known, accurate ground truth optical flow is available at every single pixel, even in regions that become occluded in the second image.
“Since all transformation parameters are known, accurate ground truth optical flow is available at every single pixel, even in regions that become occluded in the second image.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
Due to the difficulty of computing accurate ground truth, the Middlebury and KITTI datasets have been restricted to 8 and 200 pairs of frames, respectively.
“Notable works include the Middlebury dataset (Baker et al, 2011) and the KITTI datasets (Geiger et al, 2012; Menze and Geiger, 2015), but due to the difficulty of computing accurate ground truth, these have been restricted to 8 and 2 · 200 pairs of frames, respectively (the latter are also limited by the special driving setting).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Baker et al, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Geiger et al, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Menze and Geiger, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ What Makes Good Synthetic Training Data for Learning Disparity and Optical Flow Estimation? · p. 1
Manual annotation is not feasible for dense low-level tasks such as optical flow or depth estimation, especially when exact pixel-accurate ground truth is desired.
“for many computer vision problems, such as stereo or optical flow estimation, this approach is not feasible because humans cannot manually enter a pixel-accurate flow field.”
- Also stated in: § 3 Synthetic Data · p. 4 · plain
“For dense low-level tasks, such as optical flow or depth estimation, manual annotation is not feasible, especially when exact and pixel-accurate ground truth is desired.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3 Synthetic Data · p. 4 · plain
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
The approach of generating data from open source movies does not scale arbitrarily due to the limited availability of open source movies.
“Moreover, the approach does not scale arbitrarily due to the limited availability of open source movies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 10
Training data can be improved if it is possible to reason about the target domain.
“Our results confirm that training data can be improved if it is possible to reason about the target domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
The largest effect of lighting is the larger number of visual features on object surfaces.
“The largest effect of lighting, though, is the larger number of visual features on object surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 4.2 Disparity Estimation · p. 8
DispNetCorr1D can process a much wider receptive field at the same computational cost compared to a FlowNet with a 2D correlation layer.
“Thus, compared to a FlowNet with a 2D correlation layer, the DispNet- Corr1D can process a much wider receptive field at the same computational cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mayer et al (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4.1 Lens distortion and blur · p. 16
This cannot be inferred from the original training data with crisp contours.
“This cannot be inferred from the original training data with crisp contours.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 10
Nonrigid 2D deformations can approximate the flow patterns exhibited by rotating 3D objects.
“The nonrigid 2D deformations can approximate the flow patterns exhibited by rotating 3D objects; the effect of training with this is noticeable in Sintel, and strongest in KITTI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 5.2.3 Displacement statistics · p. 11
The problem of sensitivity to displacement statistics can be largely alleviated by learning schedules and by architectures that mix specialized networks.
“This problem can be largely alleviated by the use of learning schedules, as described in Section 5.3, and by architectures that mix specialized networks, as proposed by Ilg et al (2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ilg et al (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
The effect of dynamic lighting is much smaller because highlights are sparse in the image.
“The effect of dynamic lighting is much smaller because highlights are sparse in the image.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4.1 Lens distortion and blur · p. 16
The network seems to have learned that object boundaries can be blurry.
“the network seems to have learned that object boundaries can be blurry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.2.5 Data augmentation · p. 14
The raw dataset already contains sufficiently varied displacements, so additional augmentation between frames cannot generate helpful new data.
“The raw dataset seems to already contain sufficiently varied displacements, such that additional augmentation between frames cannot generate helpful new data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.2.2 Textures · p. 11
The poor performance when training on the Monkaa dataset is explained by its highly repetitive and monotonous textures.
“This shows how important the diversity of textures during training is for the final network performance, and explains the poor performance when training a network on the Monkaa dataset, which comprises complex objects and motion patterns, but highly repetitive and monotonous textures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Monkaa dataset comprises complex objects and motion patterns but highly repetitive and monotonous textures.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
Estimating optical flow for shadeless objects is hard because the only usable features are given by the shape of the object contour.
“Estimating optical flow for these objects is hard because the only usable features are given by the shape of the object contour.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5.2 What makes a good training dataset? · p. 8
The optical flow estimation task does not have to be trained on data that semantically matches the test data.
“In Dosovitskiy et al (2015), we showed that the optical flow estimation task does not have to be trained on data which semantically matches the test data: there are no chairs in the Sintel dataset, but the network trained on the FlyingChairs dataset performs well on Sintel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dosovitskiy et al (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 10
There is no single best general-purpose training dataset.
“On the other hand, this is also disappointing because it indicates that there is no single best general-purpose training dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
The network must learn to distinguish different surface materials to fully exploit the lighting cue.
“The network must learn to distinguish the different surface materials to fully exploit the lighting cue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Some surfaces in Sintel and in real scenes are Lambertian, others shiny.
- Interpretationown data§ 5.2.6 Amount of training data · p. 14
Augmentation allows for a ∼100-fold reduction of the training data and still provides better results.
“Therefore, augmentation allows for a ∼ 100 -fold reduction of the training data and still provides better results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Data augmentation increases the effective size of the training dataset.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13
A training set that only contains chairs is possibly not sufficient to capture different surface materials.
“A training set that only contains chairs is possibly not sufficient to capture different surface materials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Some surfaces in Sintel and in real scenes are Lambertian, others shiny.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.1 Monkaa · p. 6
The approach of generating data from the Monkaa movie cannot be scaled easily to produce more data.
“This greatly limited the amount of usable scenes and contributes to the fact that this approach to data generation cannot be scaled easily to produce more data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.2.2 Textures · p. 11
Diversity of textures during training is important for final network performance.
“This shows how important the diversity of textures during training is for the final network performance, and explains the poor performance when training a network on the Monkaa dataset, which comprises complex objects and motion patterns, but highly repetitive and monotonous textures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1 Optical Flow Estimation · p. 8
FlowNetC consistently outperforms FlowNetS.
“In Ilg et al (2017), we found that the FlowNetC consistently outperforms the FlowNetS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ilg et al (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 5.2.3 Displacement statistics · p. 11
Matching the displacement distribution of the test set is important.
“Clearly, matching the displacement distribution of the test set is important.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 6 Conclusion · p. 17
Learning schedules that combine multiple different datasets, especially simpler and more complex ones, are a way to greatly improve the generic performance of the trained networks.
“Learning schedules that combine multiple different datasets, especially simpler and more complex ones, are a way to greatly improve the generic performance of the trained networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 6 Conclusion · p. 17
Modeling distortions of the camera in the training data largely improves the network's performance when run with this camera.
“Modeling distortions of the camera in the training data largely improves the network's performance when run with this camera.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 6 Conclusion · p. 17
Most of the learning task can be accomplished via simplistic data and data augmentation.
“Most of the learning task can be accomplished via simplistic data and data augmentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4.2 Bayer-interpolation artifacts · p. 17
FlyingThings3D data (degraded or not) cannot teach disparity priors for KITTI's street scenes.
“FlyingThings3D data (degraded or not) cannot teach disparity priors for KITTI's street scenes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 38
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 1 Introduction · p. 2Multistage training on multiple separate datasets works better than either one of the datasets by itself and better than a full mix of both.
“multistage training on multiple separate datasets works better than not only either one of the datasets by itself, but also than a full mix of both”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.1.2 Synthetic 3D data for optical flow, disparity and scene flow: FlyingThings3D · p. 5The generated FlyingThings3D scenes are not realistic in the naturalistic sense but allow for a large and diverse dataset.
“While the generated scenes are by no means realistic in the naturalistic sense of e.g . Sintel, they allow for a large and diverse dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.2 Synthetic 3D data for optical flow, disparity and scene flow: FlyingThings3D · p. 5FlyingThings3D is a 3D dataset rendered from true 3D models, with ground truth for stereo disparity, optical flow, and full scene flow.
“we took the randomization approach further and created FlyingThings3D: a 3D dataset rendered from true 3D models, with ground truth for stereo disparity, optical flow, and for the full scene flow task (Mayer et al, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mayer et al, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.1.1 2D image pairs for optical flow: FlyingChairs · p. 4The resulting FlyingChairs images resemble those from McCane et al (2001), but with thousands of randomized scenes instead of a few manually created ones.
“The resulting images resemble those from McCane et al (2001) ( cf. Fig. 1), yet with the crucial difference that there are thousands of randomized scenes instead of a few manually created ones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McCane et al (2001) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.2.1 Monkaa · p. 6The Monkaa dataset contains articulated non-rigid motion of animals and extremely complex fur.
“Contrary to the datasets mentioned above, Monkaa contains articulated non-rigid motion of animals and extremely complex fur.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 1 Introduction · p. 2The Sintel training set consists of 1041 image pairs, which is sufficient to train a network but not a very powerful one.
“Still, the dataset is small by deep learning standards: The training set consists of 1041 image pairs - which is sufficient to train a network, but not a very powerful one, as we show in this paper.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.2.2 Textures · p. 11Flickr textures generalize best to new datasets and yield the best results on Sintel.
“Table 4 shows that the Flickr textures generalize best to new datasets. In particular, they yield the best results on the Sintel dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 10Nonrigid deformations help on Sintel and KITTI, but not on the rigid FlyingChairs.
“Nonrigid deformations help on Sintel and KITTI, but not on the rigid FlyingChairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 10Adding rotation motion yields the biggest improvement on FlyingChairs, which is also the test set with the strongest object rotation.
“The observations can be explained by looking at the types of object motion present in each test dataset: adding rotation motion yields the biggest improvement on FlyingChairs which is also the testset with the strongest object rotation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 5.2.6 Amount of training data · p. 14More data is always better.
“while more data is indeed always better”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: It is generally accepted that more training data leads to better results in supervised training.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.2.2 Driving · p. 6Fine-tuning on the Driving dataset teaches a network useful priors and largely improves performance on KITTI compared to training on data without such priors.
“The experiments in this paper confirm the intuition that fine-tuning on this data should teach a network useful priors, e.g . a flat road surface at the bottom, and thus largely improve the performance on KITTI compared to training on data without such priors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14FlyingThings3D performs worse than FlyingChairs in the 40-160 pixel displacement range despite displacements in that range being well represented.
“although displacements between 40 and 160 pixels are well represented in FlyingThings3D, it still performs worse than FlyingChairs in that displacement range.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5.2.6 Amount of training data · p. 14Best results are achieved when using both augmentation and as much raw data as possible.
“we achieved the best results when using both augmentation and as much raw data as possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 10The effect of training with nonrigid 2D deformations is noticeable in Sintel and strongest in KITTI.
“the effect of training with this is noticeable in Sintel, and strongest in KITTI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5.2.5 Data augmentation · p. 14Color changes between frames always introduce new data because the unaugmented dataset does not contain this effect, and applying the same color augmentation to both frames does not change this.
“Contrary to this, color changes between frames always introduce new data: the unaugmented dataset does not contain this effect, and applying the same color augmentation to both frames does not change this.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.2.3 Displacement statistics · p. 12The FlyingThings3D dataset was not tuned to match any specific histogram and contains relatively few small displacements.
“The FlyingThings3D dataset was not tuned to match any specific histogram and contains relatively few small displacements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.2.1 Object shape and motion · p. 9Adding only rotations does not lead to much better scores and even decreases the score on KITTI, while adding scaling motions on top yields a large improvement.
“While adding only rotations does not lead to much better scores and even decreases the score on KITTI, adding scaling motions on top yields a large improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13A network trained on static lighting cannot exploit dynamic lighting features, but performs best on Sintel whose realistic lighting setup generates both static and dynamic effects.
“A network trained on static lighting cannot exploit dynamic lighting features, but performs best on Sintel whose realistic lighting setup generates both 'static' and 'dynamic' effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ 5.2.5 Data augmentation · p. 14Additional geometry augmentation between the frames of a sample is an exception; it does not improve performance.
“The notable exception is additional geometry augmentation between the frames of a sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.2.3 Displacement statistics · p. 11Using the same displacement statistics as Sintel leads to the best results, whereas large deviations from these statistics lead to a large drop in performance.
“Using the same displacement statistics as Sintel (denoted as 'Sintel-like') leads to the best results, whereas large deviations from these statistics lead to a large drop in performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.4.2 Bayer-interpolation artifacts · p. 17A difference image between the disparity estimates of our two synthetic-data networks reveals that most changes occur at object boundaries, and the highlighted crops are located in an image region for which there is no ground truth at all.
“A difference image between the disparity estimates of our two synthetic-data networks reveals that most changes actually occur at object boundaries, and the highlighted crops are located in an image region for which there is no ground truth at all.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1.1 2D image pairs for optical flow: FlyingChairs · p. 4To learn optical flow estimation, any image pair with computable pixelwise ground truth displacements can serve as training data.
“This means that to learn this task, any image pair with computable pixelwise ground truth displacements can serve as training data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 3 Synthetic Data · p. 4Creating photo-realistic image data is not trivial, and it is not obvious which aspects of the real world are relevant and must be modeled.
“The difficulties are that creating photo-realistic image data is not trivial, and that it is not obvious which aspects of the real world are relevant and must be modeled (these problems arise because we are unable to perfectly simulate the real world).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3 Synthetic Data · p. 4Starting off with a simple general scene and combining it with randomly sampled dynamic elements can yield datasets that are abstract but powerful and potentially of unlimited size.
“Using our randomized 2D and 3D datasets as examples, we first discuss how starting off with a simple general scene and combining it with randomly sampled dynamic elements can yield datasets that are abstract but powerful and potentially of unlimited size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1.2 Synthetic 3D data for optical flow, disparity and scene flow: FlyingThings3D · p. 5The 3D setting with combined object and camera motions allows for complex object flows and scene configurations.
“This 3D setting with combined object and camera motions allows for complex object flows and scene configurations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1.2 Synthetic 3D data for optical flow, disparity and scene flow: FlyingThings3D · p. 5The FlyingThings3D dataset combines sophisticated 3D rendering with procedural generation of scenes, allowing for arbitrary amounts of data without manual effort.
“The FlyingThings3D dataset combines sophisticated 3D rendering with the procedural generation of scenes which allows for arbitrary amounts of data without manual effort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 2Sintel provides ground truth for optical flow, disparities and occlusion areas, and has been largely adopted as a serious benchmark dataset despite its synthetic nature.
“Sintel provides ground truth for optical flow, disparities and occlusion areas, and has been largely adopted as a serious benchmark dataset despite its synthetic nature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Butler et al, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ 3 Synthetic Data · p. 4The key idea of synthetic data is that we have perfect knowledge and control of the virtual world, allowing us to produce perfect ground truth annotations along with the images.
“The key idea is that we have perfect knowledge and control of the virtual 'world' from which we create our image data, and that we are thus able to produce perfect ground truth annotations along with the images.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 2The MPI-Sintel dataset demonstrated the feasibility of using existing data from an open source movie to render videos together with the desired ground truth.
“The MPI-Sintel dataset demonstrated the feasibility of using existing data from an open source movie to render videos together with the desired ground truth (Butler et al, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Butler et al, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14A possible reason is that the simpler FlyingChairs dataset helps the network learn the general concept of finding correspondences without developing possibly confusing priors for 3D motion too early.
“A reason might be that the simpler FlyingChairs dataset helps the network learn the general concept of finding correspondences without developing possibly confusing priors for 3D motion too early.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2 What makes a good training dataset? · p. 9The disparity results are presumably valid for optical flow as well, just as the optical flow results can likely be applied to disparity estimation.
“Considering how closely related the two tasks are, the disparity results are presumably valid for optical flow as well, just as the optical flow results can likely be applied to disparity estimation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Optical flow and disparity estimation are closely related tasks.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3 Data augmentation · p. 7The use of data augmentation within the training process is more efficient than storing and reading additional data from disk because data can be generated on the fly.
“While our 2D and 3D datasets offer much more training data than had previously been available, the use of data augmentation within the training process is much more efficient: additional data need not be stored and read from disk during training but can be generated on the fly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The learning algorithm is unable to filter out the small changes introduced by data augmentation and instead perceives the modified data as actual new data with new information.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 5.2.6 Amount of training data · p. 14An augmented existing sample is not the same as a truly new sample; augmentation cannot create new textures or change relative positions within a group of objects.
“However, an augmented existing sample is not the same as a truly new sample: for example, augmentation as we use it cannot create new textures or change the relative positions within a group of objects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ 3.3 Data augmentation · p. 7Any described geometry augmentation still yields a valid optical flow training sample by composing the computed flow induced by the augmentation operation with the existing flow of the original sample.
“Note that any of the described geometry augmentations still yields a valid optical flow training sample by simply composing the computed flow induced by the augmentation operation with the existing flow of the original sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 5.4.2 Bayer-interpolation artifacts · p. 16Adding these effects helps, but from the qualitative results one might expect a larger difference.
“This shows that adding these effects helps, but from the qualitative results one might expect a larger difference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13The dynamic lighting network performs worse on Sintel because Sintel scenes lack a strong directional light source, so objects have 'static' features but not the hard shadows produced in the dynamic setup.
“if there is no strong directional light source in a Sintel scene, the objects have 'static' features but not the hard shadows produced in our 'dynamic' setup.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5.4 Synthesizing the defects of real imaging · p. 15The OVVV dataset uses a comparable approach, simulating analog video effects to make evaluation data for video surveillance systems more realistic.
“The OVVV dataset by Taylor et al (2007) uses a comparable approach, simulating analog video effects to make their evaluation data for video surveillance systems more realistic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Taylor et al (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 5.2.6 Amount of training data · p. 14Augmentation has inherent limits.
“However, augmentation has inherent limits”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Data augmentation increases the effective size of the training dataset.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5.2.3 Displacement statistics · p. 11Classical optical flow estimation methods are sensitive to displacement magnitude; variational methods have advantages for small displacements, while large displacements require extra treatment and combinatorial techniques.
“Classical optical flow estimation methods are sensitive to the displacement magnitude. Variational methods (Horn and Schunck, 1981) have clear advantages in case of small displacements, whereas large displacements require extra treatment and the use of additional combinatorial techniques (Brox et al, 2004; Brox and Malik, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 12In the real world and realistically lit synthetic data, interaction between light and object surfaces generates reflections, highlights, and shadows, which can violate the photoconsistency assumption and pose a challenge to vision algorithms.
“In the real world (and in realistically lit synthetic data, such as Sintel), the interaction between light and object surfaces generates reflections, highlights, and shadows. These phenomena pose a challenge to vision algorithms because they can violate the photoconsistency assumption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ 5.4 Synthesizing the defects of real imaging · p. 15The fact that synthetic data was not recorded by a physical camera already makes it different.
“yet the fact that this synthetic data was not recorded by a physical camera already makes it different.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3 Data augmentation · p. 7Disparity estimation for stereo cameras is a more geometrically constrained setting than optical flow, with fixed camera transformation, so fewer augmentation options are available.
“However, disparity estimation for stereo cameras is a more geometrically constrained setting than optical flow: the transformation between the two cameras is fixed, and e.g . rotating both views of a sample pair or zooming one view relative to the other would disturb the epipolar geometry. This means that for disparity the setting is more restricted and fewer augmentation options are available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13The inferiority of the FlyingThings3D-trained network is partially explained by the difficulty of learning to distinguish surface materials.
“The latter would also partially explain why the FlyingThings3D dataset, which comes with realistic lighting and many object categories, leads to a network that is inferior to one trained on FlyingChairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Some surfaces in Sintel and in real scenes are Lambertian, others shiny.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14Presenting a too sophisticated dataset too early is disadvantageous, but at a later stage it actually helps.
“From this observation, we conclude that presenting a too sophisticated dataset too early is disadvantageous, but at a later stage it actually helps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.6 Amount of training data · p. 14Data augmentation serves purpose (a): if it only replicates effects found in original data, it increases effective size without changing domain, helping if dataset is not big enough.
“if it only replicates the effects found in the original data, then augmentation increases the effective size of the training set without changing the domain of the data. This can help if the dataset is just not big enough.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Data augmentation increases the effective size of the training dataset.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Optical Flow Estimation · p. 7The FlowNet was the first network trained end-to-end for optical flow estimation.
“The FlowNet was introduced by Dosovitskiy et al (2015). This network was the first to be trained end-to-end for optical flow estimation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dosovitskiy et al (2015)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.3 Learning schedules with multiple datasets · p. 14Not only the content of the data matters, but also the point of time at which it is presented to the network during training.
“This reveals that not only the content of the data matters, but also the point of time at which it is presented to the network during the training phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown data§ 5.2 What makes a good training dataset? · p. 9Due to time and compute power constraints, the authors could not evaluate both parts of their experiments suite on both optical flow and disparity estimation.
“Due to time and compute power constraints, we could not evaluate both parts of our experiments suite on both optical flow and disparity estimation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 5.4 Synthesizing the defects of real imaging · p. 15Applying camera artifacts to rendered objects makes augmented-reality objects blend well into real images.
“As a result, augmented-reality objects blended well into the real images; without this adjustment, the rendered objects stood out because they looked unnaturally clean and clear.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klein and Murray (2010) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.2.4 Lighting · p. 13The dynamic lighting scenario presents the most realistic effects and allows the network to learn about lighting effects, but makes the learning task harder because the network must distinguish materials and ignore specular highlight motion.
“This scenario presents the most realistic effects. It allows the network to learn about lighting effects, but this also makes the learning task harder: the network must learn to distinguish between different materials and that in case of specular materials, the changing position of a highlight is not supposed to induce optical flow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 5.1 Testing environments · p. 8Evaluation on Sintel covers generalization of the network to other synthetic datasets, while KITTI experiments cover generalization to real-world data in the restricted setting of a driving scenario.
“While the evaluation on Sintel covers the generalization of the network to other synthetic datasets, the KITTI experiments cover the generalization to real-world data in the restricted setting of a driving scenario.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 6 Conclusion · p. 17Realistic effects, such as sophisticated lighting models, are not important to learn basic optical flow, but merely induce minor improvements.
“Realistic effects, such as sophisticated lighting models, are not important to learn basic optical flow, but merely induce minor improvements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 6 Conclusion · p. 17These findings are valid for optical flow (1-3) and disparity estimation (4).
“According to our evaluation, these findings are valid for optical flow (1-3) and disparity estimation (4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 6 Conclusion · p. 17Diversity is important; a network trained on specialized data generalizes worse to other datasets than a network trained on diverse data.
“(1) Diversity is important. A network trained on specialized data generalizes worse to other datasets than a network trained on diverse data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 6 Conclusion · p. 17These findings may not hold for high-level tasks such as object recognition.
“They may not hold for high-level tasks such as object recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The learning algorithm is unable to filter out the small changes introduced by data augmentation and instead perceives the modified data as actual new data with new information.
“It relies on the assumption that the learning algorithm is unable to filter out the small changes and instead perceives the modified data as actual new data with new information.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Optical flow and disparity estimation are closely related tasks.
“Considering how closely related the two tasks are, the disparity results are presumably valid for optical flow as well, just as the optical flow results can likely be applied to disparity estimation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The dominant motion in KITTI is scaling motion induced by the scene moving towards the camera.
“The dominant motion in KITTI is scaling motion induced by the scene moving towards the camera.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Monkaa dataset comprises complex objects and motion patterns but highly repetitive and monotonous textures.
“explains the poor performance when training a network on the Monkaa dataset, which comprises complex objects and motion patterns, but highly repetitive and monotonous textures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Real data with good ground truth is not always available in quantity or even possible.
“real data with good ground truth is not always available in quantity or even possible”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some surfaces in Sintel and in real scenes are Lambertian, others shiny.
“Some surfaces in Sintel and in real scenes are Lambertian, others shiny.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The KITTI ground truth is sparse and has gaps along object contours, due to its acquisition method using a laser scanner and the perspective difference between the scanner and the camera.
“the KITTI ground truth is sparse and has gaps along object contours, due to the nature of its acquisition method using a laser scanner and the perspective difference between the scanner and the camera.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is generally accepted that more training data leads to better results in supervised training.
“It is generally accepted that more training data leads to better results in supervised training.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Data augmentation increases the effective size of the training dataset.
“Data augmentation increases the effective size of the training dataset.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Replacing auto-masking with a re-implementation of the predictive mask from [76] is worse than using no masking at all.
“We find that this ablated model is worse than using no masking at all, while our auto-masking improves results in all cases.”
From Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2019) · cites this paper as [76]
Our models generate higher quality outputs and do not produce holes in the depth maps or border artifacts that can be seen in many existing baselines.
“We can see that our models generate higher quality outputs and do not produce 'holes' in the depth maps or border artifacts that can be seen in many existing baselines e.g.[76,51,15,73].”
From Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2019) · cites this paper as [76]
As a baseline we compare against the pose network used by [62], which builds upon [76] with an additional scaling of the translation by the mean of the inverse depth.
“As a baseline we compare against the pose network used by [62], which builds upon [76] with an additional scaling of the translation by the mean of the inverse depth.”
From Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2019) · cites this paper as [76]
In [76], the authors independently scale each predicted depth map by the ratio of the median of the ground truth and predicted depth map for each individual test image.
“In [76], the authors independently scale each predicted depth map by the ratio of the median of the ground truth and predicted depth map -for each individual test im-age.”
From Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2019) · cites this paper as [76]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Incorrect EPE difference for 0-10 pixel displacements
MinorIn Table 7, 1.46 minus 0.87 is 0.59, not the reported 0.49.
Reported 0.49 · recomputed 0.59
“| 0 - 10 px | 0 . 87 | 1 . 46 | 0 . 49 |”
FlyingChairs is not better than Monkaa on every test set
MinorTable 2 reports a lower KITTI2015 error for Monkaa (16.17) than for FlyingChairs (16.23), contradicting the claim that FlyingChairs yields consistently better numbers.
“Surprisingly, the FlyingChairs datasets yields consistently better numbers than the more sophisticated FlyingThings3D and Monkaa datasets.”
“| FlyingChairs | 5 . 73 | 16 . 23 | 3 . 32 | | FlyingThings3D | 6 . 64 | 18 . 31 | 5 . 21 | | Monkaa | 8 . 47 | 16 . 17 | 7 . 08 |”
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333 · see citing works
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460 · see citing works
Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248074 · Cited by 14,897 · see citing works
The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding
Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., & Schiele, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.350 · Cited by 12,433 · see citing works
Horn, B. K. P., & Schunck, B. G. (1981) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(81)90024-2 · Cited by 10,312 · see citing works
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
(2017) · doi:10.1109/cvpr35066.2017 · Cited by 7,281 · see citing works
Indoor segmentation and support inference from rgbd images
Silberman, N., Hoiem, D., Kohli, P., & Fergus, R. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33715-4_54 · Cited by 5,760 · see citing works
Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553380 · Cited by 5,366 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is strongly connected to curriculum learning, which has previously been applied to shape recognition (Bengio et al, 2009; Elman, 1993) and other (non-vision) tasks.”
MethodScanNet: Richly-Annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenes
Dai, A., Chang, A. X., Savva, M., Halber, M., Funkhouser, T., & Niessner, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.261 · Cited by 4,368 · see citing works
Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks
Dosovitskiy, A., Fischer, P., Ilg, E., Hausser, P., Hazirbas, C., Golkov, V., Smagt, P. V. D., Cremers, D., & Brox, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.316 · Cited by 4,313 · see citing works
Self-citationA benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems
Sturm, J., Engelhard, N., Endres, F., Burgard, W., & Cremers, D. (2012) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6385773 · Cited by 4,098 · see citing works
Self-citationCARLA: An open urban driving simulator
Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.03938 · Cited by 3,718 · see citing works
Self-citationDepth Map Prediction from a Single Image using a Multi-Scale Deep Network
Eigen, D., Puhrsch, C., & Fergus, R. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.2283 · Cited by 3,442 · see citing works
High Accuracy Optical Flow Estimation Based on a Theory for Warping
Brox, T., Bruhn, A., Papenberg, N., & Weickert, J. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24673-2_3 · Cited by 2,634 · see citing works
Self-citationMayer, N., Ilg, E., Hausser, P., Fischer, P., Cremers, D., Dosovitskiy, A., & Brox, T. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.438 · Cited by 2,488 · see citing works
Self-citationRos, G., Sellart, L., Materzynska, J., Vazquez, D., & Lopez, A. M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.352 · Cited by 2,338 · see citing works
ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository
Chang, A. X., Funkhouser, T., Guibas, L., Hanrahan, P., Huang, Q., Li, Z., Savarese, S., Savva, M., Song, S., Su, H., et al. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03012 · Cited by 2,330 · see citing works
Object scene flow for autonomous vehicles
Menze, M., & Geiger, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298925 · Cited by 2,270 · see citing works
A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow
Baker, S., Scharstein, D., Lewis, J. P., Roth, S., Black, M. J., & Szeliski, R. (2011) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-010-0390-2 · Cited by 2,205 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Notable works include the Middlebury dataset (Baker et al, 2011) and the KITTI datasets (Geiger et al, 2012; Menze and Geiger, 2015), but due to the difficulty of computing accurate ground truth, these have been restricted to 8 and 2 200 pairs of frames, respectively (the latter are also limited by…”
MethodLearning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small
Elman, J. L. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90058-4 · Cited by 1,988 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is strongly connected to curriculum learning, which has previously been applied to shape recognition (Bengio et al, 2009; Elman, 1993) and other (non-vision) tasks.”
MethodPlaying for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Games
Richter, S. R., Vineet, V., Roth, S., & Koltun, V. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_7 · Cited by 1,928 · see citing works
A Naturalistic Open Source Movie for Optical Flow Evaluation
Butler, D. J., Wulff, J., Stanley, G. B., & Black, M. J. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33783-3_44 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
High-Resolution Stereo Datasets with Subpixel-Accurate Ground Truth
Scharstein, D., Hirschmüller, H., Kitajima, Y., Krathwohl, G., Nešić, N., Wang, X., & Westling, P. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11752-2_3 · Cited by 1,377 · see citing works
Large Displacement Optical Flow: Descriptor Matching in Variational Motion Estimation
Brox, T., & Malik, J. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.143 · Cited by 1,295 · see citing works
Self-citationSemantic Scene Completion from a Single Depth Image
Song, S., Yu, F., Zeng, A., Chang, A. X., Savva, M., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.28 · Cited by 1,244 · see citing works
VirtualWorlds as Proxy for Multi-object Tracking Analysis
Gaidon, A., Wang, Q., Cabon, Y., & Vig, E. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.470 · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
A benchmark for RGB-D visual odometry, 3D reconstruction and SLAM
Handa, A., Whelan, T. J., McDonald, J., & Davison, A. J. (2014) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6907054 · Cited by 907 · see citing works
SUN3D: A Database of Big Spaces Reconstructed Using SfM and Object Labels
Xiao, J., Owens, A., & Torralba, A. B. (2013) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.458 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Cut, Paste and Learn: Surprisingly Easy Synthesis for Instance Detection
Dwibedi, D., Misra, I., & Hebert, M. (2017) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.146 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
Render for CNN: Viewpoint Estimation in Images Using CNNs Trained with Rendered 3D Model Views
Su, H., Qi, C. R., Li, Y., & Guibas, L. J. (2015) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.308 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Model for the extraction of image flow
Heeger, D. J. (1987) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.4.001455 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Seeing 3D Chairs: Exemplar Part-Based 2D-3D Alignment Using a Large Dataset of CAD Models
Aubry, M., Maturana, D., Efros, A. A., Russell, B. C., & Šivic, J. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.487 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Richter, S. R., Hayder, Z., & Koltun, V. (2017) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.243 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
A Variational Method for Scene Flow Estimation from Stereo Sequences
Huguet, F., & Devernay, F. (2007) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2007.4409000 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
SceneNet RGB-D: Can 5M Synthetic Images Beat Generic ImageNet Pre-training on Indoor Segmentation?
McCormac, J., Handa, A., Leutenegger, S., & Davison, A. J. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.292 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
UnrealCV: Connecting Computer Vision to Unreal Engine
Qiu, W., & Yuille, A. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_75 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Physically-Based Rendering for Indoor Scene Understanding Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Zhang, Y., Song, S., Yumer, E., Savva, M., Lee, J., Jin, H., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.537 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
McCane, B., Novins, K., Crannitch, D., & Galvin, B. (2001) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.2001.0930 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Understanding RealWorld Indoor Scenes with Synthetic Data
Handa, A., Pătrăucean, V., Badrinarayanan, V., Stent, S., & Cipolla, R. (2016) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.442 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Procedural Generation of Videos to Train Deep Action Recognition Networks
de Souza, C. R., Gaidon, A., Cabon, Y., & López, A. M. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.278 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
How Useful Is Photo-Realistic Rendering for Visual Learning?
Movshovitz-Attias, Y., Kanade, T., & Sheikh, Y. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_18 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
OVVV: Using Virtual Worlds to Design and Evaluate Surveillance Systems
Taylor, G. R., Chosak, A. J., & Brewer, P. C. (2007) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383518 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Differences between stereo and motion behaviour on synthetic and real-world stereo sequences
Vaudrey, T., Rabe, C., Klette, R., & Milburn, J. (2008) · International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ) · doi:10.1109/ivcnz.2008.4762133 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Learning a Confidence Measure for Optical Flow
Aodha, O. M., Humayun, A., Pollefeys, M., & Brostow, G. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.171 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Lessons and Insights from Creating a Synthetic Optical Flow Benchmark
Wulff, J., Butler, D. J., Stanley, G. B., & Black, M. J. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33868-7_17 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Segmenting video into classes of algorithm-suitability
Aodha, O. M., Brostow, G., & Pollefeys, M. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540099 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Otte, M., & Nagel, H.-H. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(95)00033-x · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Simulating Low-Cost Cameras for Augmented Reality Compositing
Klein, G., & Murray, D. W. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2009.210 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
UnrealStereo: A Synthetic Dataset for Analyzing Stereo Vision.
Zhang, Y., Qiu, W., Chen, Q., Hu, X., & Yuille, A. (2016) · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Real versus realistically rendered scenes for optical flow evaluation
Meister, S., & Kondermann, D. (2011) · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Speed and Texture: An Empirical Study on Optical-Flow Accuracy in ADAS Scenarios
Onkarappa, N., & Sappa, A. D. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2013.2274760 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
UnrealStereo: Controlling Hazardous Factors to Analyze Stereo VisionPreprint
Zhang, Y., Qiu, W., Chen, Q., et al. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.04647 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Barron, J. L., Fleet, D. J., & Beauchemin, S. S. (1994). Performance of optical flow techniques. IJCV, 12, 43–77.
- Mac Aodha, O., Brostow, G. J., Pollefeys, M. (2010). Segmenting video into classes of algorithm-suitability. In 2010 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR) (pp. 1054–1061). IEEE. · DOI
- Mac Aodha, O., Humayun, A., Pollefeys, M., & Brostow, G. J. (2013). Learning a confidence measure for optical flow. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(5), 1107–1120. · DOI
- Wu, Z., Song, S., Khosla, A., Yu, F., Zhang, L., Tang, X., Xiao, J. (2015) 3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation
Godard, C., Aodha, O. M., Firman, M., & Brostow, G. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00393 · Cited by 2,561 · see citing works
Hagendorff, T. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09573-8 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Learning, a Survey on Recent Advances
Savian, S., Elahi, M., & Tillo, T. (2020) · Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32583-1_12 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mayer, N., Ilg, E., Fischer, P., Hazirbas, C., Cremers, D., Dosovitskiy, A., & Brox, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Mayer, Nikolaus
- Venue
- International Journal of Computer Vision
- Published
- 2018-04-02
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 942-960
- ISSN
- 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1405
- OpenAlex
- W2784652921
- Semantic Scholar
- ec1f3f1f1d9af3046650c3a30f95a7f2f0a78390
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (VideoLearn)
- European Research Council (3D Reloaded)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (Trimbot202)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BR 3815/7-1, CR 250/17-1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- synthetic training data, optical flow, disparity estimation, stereo vision, data augmentation, generalization, learning rate scheduling, multi-stage training, deep networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review