Cited by 56Image and Video Quality AssessmentNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlMultimedia Communication and Technology

QoE in video streaming over wireless networks: perspectives and research challenges

Su, Guan-Ming, Su, Xiao, Bai, Yan, Wang, Mea, Vasilakos, Athanasios V., Wang, Haohong·2016·Wireless Networks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11276-015-1028-7

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, G.-M., Su, X., Bai, Y., Wang, M., Vasilakos, A. V., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
  • Dolby (United States) (US)
  • San Jose State University (US)
  • University of Washington Tacoma (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Luleå University of Technology (SE)
  • TCL (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Su, Guan-Ming
Venue
Wireless Networks
Published
2015-08-25
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
1571-1593
ISSN
  • 1022-0038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8196
OpenAlex
W1191960083
Cited by
55
References
114
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wireless Networks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multimedia Communication and Technology
Keywords
quality of experience, video streaming, QoE metrics, adaptive streaming, 3D video streaming, LTE networks, mobile devices, user satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review