Cited by 7Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataData Management and AlgorithmsCloud Data Security Solutions

A low cost and un-cancelled laplace noise based differential privacy algorithm for spatial decompositions

Li, Xiaocui, Wang, Yangtao, Song, Jingkuan, Liu, Yu, Zhang, Xinyu, Zhou, Ke, Li, Chunhua·2020·World Wide Web

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11280-019-00769-8

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, X., Wang, Y., Song, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Zhou, K., & Li, C.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics (CN)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Chunhua
Venue
World Wide Web
Published
2020-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
549-572
ISSN
  • 1386-145X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1413
OpenAlex
W3000354307
Cited by
7
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
World Wide Web (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Data Management and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
differential privacy, Laplace noise, spatial decomposition, noise cancellation, query privacy, sensitivity analysis, spatial data privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review