The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in food webs
Open accessAbstract
Recent theoretical and experimental work provides clear evidence that biodiversity loss can have profound impacts on functioning of natural and managed ecosystems and the ability of ecosystems to deliver ecological services to human societies. Work on simplified ecosystems in which the diversity of a single trophic level is manipulated shows that diversity can enhance ecosystem processes such as primary productivity and nutrient retention. Theory also strongly suggests that biodiversity can act as biological insurance against potential disruptions caused by environmental changes. However, these studies generally concern a single trophic level, primary producers for the most part. Changes in biodiversity also affect ecosystem functioning through trophic interactions. Here we review, through the analysis of a simple ecosystem model, several key aspects inherent in multitrophic systems that may strongly affect the relationship between diversity and ecosystem processes. Our analysis shows that trophic interactions have a strong impact on the relationships between diversity and ecosystem functioning, whether the ecosystem property considered is total biomass or temporal variability of biomass at the various trophic levels. In both cases, food‐web structure and trade‐offs that affect interaction strength have major effects on these relationships. Multitrophic interactions are expected to make biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships more complex and non‐linear, in contrast to the monotonic changes predicted for simplified systems with a single trophic level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis
Yachi, S., & Loreau, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463 · Cited by 3,211
Self-citationWill a Large Complex System be Stable?
MAY, R. M. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238413a0 · Cited by 2,869
Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803
Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T., & Lehman, C. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060391 · Cited by 2,373
Pimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., & Brooks, T. M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.347 · Cited by 2,230
Biodiversity, Stability, and Productivity in Competitive Communities
Lehman, C. L., & Tilman, D. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303402 · Cited by 913
Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability
McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M., & Morin, P. J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36561 · Cited by 720
Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection
Duffy, J. E. (2002) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990201.x · Cited by 653 · cited 4×
“The plasticity of consumer diet and interaction strength may strongly impact the diversity effects on both the magnitude and variation of ecosystem processes, as already suggested for species richness effects on biomass and productivity (Duffy 2002).”
InfluentialBiodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning
Duffy, J. E. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00494.x · Cited by 516
Ives, A. R., Cardinale, B. J., & Snyder, W. E. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00698.x · Cited by 448
Cited by
Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe
Tsiafouli, M. A., Thébault, E., Sgardelis, S. P., de Ruiter, P. C., van der Putten, W. H., Birkhofer, K., Hemerik, L., de Vries, F. T., Bardgett, R. D., Brady, M. V., et al. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12752 · Cited by 1,108
Self-citationBiodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective
(2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.001.0001 · Cited by 608
Self-citationEmerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research
Reiss, J., Bridle, J. R., Montoya, J. M., & Woodward, G. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.018 · Cited by 607
Linking biodiversity and ecosystems: towards a unifying ecological theory
Loreau, M. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0155 · Cited by 523
Self-citationPREDATOR DIVERSITY AND TROPHIC INTERACTIONS
Schmitz, O. J. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-0937.1 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Thébault, E., & Loreau, M.
- Venue
- Ecological Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-25
- ISSN
- 0912-3814 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1703
- OpenAlex
- W2117712681
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in food webs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11284-005-0127-9
- The paper
- Thébault, E., & Loreau, M. (2006). The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in food webs. Ecological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-005-0127-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.