The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and Preliminary Psychometric Data
STRAUS, M. A., HAMBY, S. L., BONEY-McCOY, S., & SUGARMAN, D. B. (1996) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/019251396017003001 · Cited by 6,923
Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings
Shrout, P. E. (1980) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(80)90063-4 · Cited by 6,010
Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment
Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001 · Cited by 1,316
Thompson, R. S., Bonomi, A. E., Anderson, M., Reid, R. J., Dimer, J. A., Carrell, D., & Rivara, F. P. (2006) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.01.016 · Cited by 1,307
TJADEN, P., & THOENNES, N. (2000) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778010022181769 · Cited by 1,142
An Analysis of Risk Markers in Husband to Wife Violence: The Current State of Knowledge
Hotaling, G. T., & Sugarman, D. B. (1986) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.1.2.101 · Cited by 907
Understanding Violence against Women
Renzetti, C. M., Crowell, N. A., & Burgess, A. W. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655122 · Cited by 595
Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests.
Hasselblad, V., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.167 · Cited by 579
Understanding violence against women.
National Research Council (1996) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10204-000 · Cited by 443
Cited by
Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00029.x · Cited by 959
The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews
Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833 · Cited by 763
Handling Complex Meta-analytic Data Structures Using Robust Variance Estimates: a Tutorial in R
Tanner-Smith, E. E., Tipton, E., & Polanin, J. R. (2016) · Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology · doi:10.1007/s40865-016-0026-5 · Cited by 390
Birkley, E. L., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.002 · Cited by 325
Kuijpers, K. F., van der Knaap, L. M., & Winkel, F. W. (2012) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-011-9399-8 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Feder, L., & Wilson, D. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Criminology
- Published
- 2005-04-29
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-262
- ISSN
- 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3750
- OpenAlex
- W2122189545
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11292-005-1179-0
- The paper
- Feder, L., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior? Journal of Experimental Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-1179-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
