Cited by 959Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm

Lilienfeld, Scott O.·2007·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

The phrase primum non nocere (“first, do no harm”) is a well-accepted credo of the medical and mental health professions. Although emerging data indicate that several psychological treatments may produce harm in significant numbers of individuals, psychologists have until recently paid little attention to the problem of hazardous treatments. I critically evaluate and update earlier conclusions regarding deterioration effects in psychotherapy, outline methodological obstacles standing in the way of identifying potentially harmful therapies (PHTs), provide a provisional list of PHTs, discuss the implications of PHTs for clinical science and practice, and delineate fruitful areas for further research on PHTs. A heightened emphasis on PHTs should narrow the scientist-practitioner gap and safeguard mental health consumers against harm. Moreover, the literature on PHTs may provide insight into underlying mechanisms of change that cut across many domains of psychotherapy. The field of psychology should prioritize its efforts toward identifying PHTs and place greater emphasis on potentially dangerous than on empirically supported therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00029.x

Cites

174 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lilienfeld, S. O.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Lilienfeld, Scott O.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2007-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
53-70
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2135110234
Cited by
959
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 58
FWCI
28.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
non-maleficence, mechanisms of change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review