The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drawing conclusions about causes from systematic reviews of risk factors: The Cambridge Quality Checklists
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To investigate the effects of justice system contact on future behavior, it is necessary to account for preexisting individual differences that may cause some individuals to have a higher risk of coming into contact with the justice system in the first place (e.g., see Murray, Farrington, & Eisner, 2009; Nagin & Paternoster, 1993; Piquero, Paternoster, Pogarsky, & Loughran, 2011; Pogarsky, 2002).”
From Does contact with the justice system deter or promote future delinquency? Results from a longitudinal study of British adolescent twins (2020) · cites this paper as Murray, Farrington, & Eisner, 2009
In the citing paper
“First, we followed the call of previous research (see, e.g., Farrington, 2003; Murray et al., 2009; Piquero et al., 2011; Pogarsky, 2002) and employed one of the most rigorous nonexperimental methodological designs capable of accounting for a wide range of selection effects and confounding influences.”
From Does contact with the justice system deter or promote future delinquency? Results from a longitudinal study of British adolescent twins (2020) · cites this paper as Murray et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
(2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.2.i · Cited by 14,047
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
Everitt, B. S., & Fleiss, J. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530193 · Cited by 9,034
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
The environment and disease: association or causation?
Hill, A. B. (2015) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/0141076814562718 · Cited by 7,804
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences no. 17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2006). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 (updated September 2006). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Khan, K. S., ter Riet, G., Popay, J., Nixon, J., & Kleijnen, J. (2001). Study quality assessment. In Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (Ed.), Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews (2nd ed.). York, England: York Publishing Services.
- Petrosino, A., Boruch, R. F., Farrington, D. P., Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (2003a). Toward evidence-based criminology and criminal justice: systematic reviews, the Campbell Collaboration, and the Crime and Justice Group. International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 3, 42–61.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008 · Cited by 10,636
Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., & Sekol, I. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0026407 · Cited by 664
Self-citationTtofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., Lösel, F., & Loeber, R. (2011) · Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research · doi:10.1108/17596591111132873 · Cited by 623
Self-citationRisk factors for conduct disorder and delinquency: key findings from longitudinal studies
Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2010) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371005501003 · Cited by 529
Self-citationDirect Protective and Buffering Protective Factors in the Development of Youth Violence
Lösel, F. A., & Farrington, D. P. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.029 · Cited by 556
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., & Eisner, M. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Murray, Joseph
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Criminology
- Published
- 2009-01-25
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3750
- OpenAlex
- W2044803148
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- British Academy
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/E025390/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- risk factors, causal risk factors, correlates, social intervention, social welfare, experimental evidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
