Cited by 71Policing Practices and PerceptionsCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

License plate reader (LPR) police patrols in crime hot spots: an experimental evaluation in two adjacent jurisdictions

Open access
Lum, Cynthia, Hibdon, Julie, Cave, Breanne, Koper, Christopher S., Merola, Linda·2011·Journal of Experimental Criminology

Abstract

This randomized controlled experiment tests whether license plate readers (LPR) deter crime generally, and automobile crime more specifically in crime hot spots. The limited intervention tested here reflects one current likely use of LPR at the time of this publication. We use a place-based block randomized experiment. Our subjects were 30 hot spots in two jurisdictions, 15 which were assigned to experimental conditions. The treatment involved targeted police patrols using a "sweep and sit" approach with license plate readers in these hot spots, also applying the Koper Curve timing principle. We examine effects of the intervention during and in a 30-day period post-intervention, controlling for pre-intervention levels of crime, seasonal factors, and jurisdiction. Our findings indicate that, when small numbers of LPR patrols are used in crime hot spots in the way we have tested them here, they do not seem to generate either a general or offense-specific deterrent effect. While we did not find significant findings of this intervention, a number of limitations and caveats to this study must be considered in conjunction with these findings. The authors suggest how already acquired LPRs might be used in ways that might increase their effectiveness in crime hot spots.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11292-011-9133-9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the LPR Patrols in Crime Hot Spots in Two Adjacent Jurisdictions (Lum et al., 2011), no threats to the integrity of the treatment were reported.

    “No threats to the integrity of the treatment reported”

    From Hot spots policing of small geographic areas effects on crime (2019) · cites this paper as Lum et al. (2011)

    The Experimental fidelity section reports that 20 assigned patrols were not completed in Fairfax County and 44 were not completed in Alexandria, partly because the experiment ended early for one officer. Although the authors conclude that implementation was generally proper, they do report these departures from the assigned treatment; the claim that no threats to treatment integrity were reported is therefore too categorical. Our copy provides no page number for this section. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study included both a large and small city in the designated study area (1.5%): Lum et al. (2011) evaluated the impact of license plate reader technology in crime hot spots in two adjacent jurisdictions located in Alexandria City and the eastern portion of Fairfax County (VA).

    “One study included both a large and small city in the designated study area (1.5%): Lum et al. (2011) evaluated the impact of license plate reader technology in crime hot spots in two adjacent jurisdictions located in Alexandria City and the eastern portion of Fairfax County (VA).”

    From Hot spots policing of small geographic areas effects on crime (2019) · cites this paper as Lum et al. (2011)

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In some included studies, prospective hot spot methods such as kernel density estimation (KDE) and risk terrain modeling (RTM) were used to analyze and map crime concentrations.

    “In some studies, prospective hot spot methods such as kernel density estimation (KDE) and risk terrain modeling (RTM) were used to analyze and map crime concentrations (Carter et al., 2021;Gerell, 2016;Lum et al., 2011;Mazeika, 2014).”
  • Qualitative analyses of crime hot spots based on specific criteria or journey-after-crime analyses, as well as quantitative methods such as the Local Moran's I statistic or point-pattern analyses, were commonly employed in the included studies.

    “Qualitative analyses of crime hot spots based on specific criteria or journey-after-crime analyses, as well as quantitative methods such as the Local Moran's I statistic or point-pattern analyses, were commonly employed (spatial and temporal analysis of crime or STAC) (Carter et al., 2021;Gerell, 2016;Lum et al., 2011;Mazeika, 2014).”
  • Despite the potential benefits of new technologies like LPR systems or predictive algorithms, officers were sometimes skeptical about adopting these new tools.

    “Consequently, despite the potential benefits of new technologies like LPR systems (Lum et al., 2011) or predictive algorithms (Ratcliffe et al., 2020), officers were sometimes skeptical about adopting these new tools.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bailey, T., & Gatrell, A. (1995). Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Harlow: Pearson.
  2. Barclay, P., Buckley, J., Brantingham, P. L., Brantingham, P. J., & Whinn-Yates, T. (1995). Preventing auto theft in suburban Vancouver commuter lots: Effects of a bike patrol. In R. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 6). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
  3. Ericson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997). Policing the Risk Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  4. Felson, M., & Poulsen, E. (2003). Simple indicators of crime by time of day. International Journal of Forecasting, 19, 595-601.
  5. Gardner, W., Mulvey, E., & Shaw, E. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 392-404.
  6. Koper, C. (1995). Just enough police presence: Reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hot spots. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 649-672.
  7. Lu, Y. (2003). Getting away with the stolen vehicle: An investigation of journey-after-crime. The Professional Geographer, 55(4), 422-433.
  8. Lu, Y., & Thill, J. (2003). Assessing the cluster correspondence between paired point locations. Geographical Analysis, 35(4), 290-309.
  9. Lum, C., Koper, C., & Telep, C. (2011). The evidence-based policing Matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 3-26.
  10. Maxfield, M., & Clarke, R. V. (Eds.). (2004). Understanding and preventing car theft (Crime prevention studies, Vol. 17). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
  11. Melbin, M. (1978). Night as frontier. American Sociological Review, 43(1), 3-22.
  12. National Research Council (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. W. Skogan & K. Frydl (eds.). Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  13. C. Lum et al. Boruch, R., De Moya, D., & Snyder, B. (2000). The importance of randomized field trials. Crime and Delinquency, 46(2), 156-180.
  14. Braga, A., & Bond, B. J. (2008). Policing crime and disorder hot spots: A randomized controlled trial. Criminology, 46(3), 577-607.
  15. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (Eds.). (1981). Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  16. Chan, J. (2003). Police and New Technologies. In T. Newburn (Ed.), The Handbook of Policing. Collompton: Willan.
  17. Rengert, G. (1997). Auto theft in central Philadelphia. In R. Homel (Ed.), Policing for Prevention: Reducing Crime, Public Intoxication, and Injury (pp. 199-220). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
  18. Sherman, L. W. (1990). Police Crackdowns: Initial and Residual Deterrence. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 12, 1-48.
  19. Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. New York: Routledge.
  20. Weisburd, D. (2000). Randomized experiments in criminal justice policy: Prospects and problems. Crime and Delinquency, 46(2), 181-193.
  21. Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 59(1), 42-65.
  22. Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City Drug Market Analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 711-735.
  23. Weisburd, D., & Lum, C. (2005). The Diffusion of Computerized Crime Mapping in Policing: Linking Research and Practice. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 6(5), 419-434.
  24. Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283-321.
  25. Weisburd, D., Bernasco, W., & Bruinsma, G. (Eds.). (2009). Putting crime in its place. New York: Springer.
  26. PA Consulting Group. (2003). Engaging criminality -Denying criminals the use of the road. Great Britain. London, UK: PA Consulting Group.PA Consulting Group. (2006). Police Standards Unit: Thematic review of the use of automatic number plate recognition within police forces. London, UK: PA Consulting Group.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lum, C., Hibdon, J., Cave, B., Koper, C. S., & Merola, L.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Lum, Cynthia
Venue
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2011-08-16
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
321-345
ISSN
  • 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3750
OpenAlex
W2003373130
Cited by
71
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
24.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
crime hotspots, police patrol, crime deterrence, targeted policing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review