The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An experimental evaluation of a nationally recognized employment-focused offender reentry program
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other studies did not find any benefit of employment programs; one example was the STRIVE model, which provided soft-skills training and access to a computer lab after release but no connection to a job.50”
From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Common themes in unsuccessful employment and social support interventions included not considering the participants’ strengths or interests, starting in the community (as opposed to during incarceration) or offering employment opportunities limited to only low-skill, minimum wage work.48,50,52,54”
From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994
Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002) · Federal Sentencing Reporter · doi:10.1525/fsr.2002.15.1.58 · Cited by 1,008
But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry
Travis, J. (2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-1271 · Cited by 913
A Life-Course Theory of Cumulative Disadvantage and the Stability of Delinquency
Sampson, R. J., & Laub John, H. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203793350-4 · Cited by 657
Reentry and the Ties that Bind: An Examination of Social Ties, Employment, and Recidivism
Berg, M. T., & Huebner, B. M. (2010) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.498383 · Cited by 527
Ex-offender employment programs and recidivism: A meta-analysis
Visher, C. A., Winterfield, L., & Coggeshall, M. B. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-005-8127-x · Cited by 302
Randomized experiments in criminology: what have we learned in the last two decades?
Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-004-6460-0 · Cited by 297
A Signaling Perspective on Employment‐Based Reentry Programming
Bushway, S. D., & Apel, R. J. (2012) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00786.x · Cited by 278
Carson, E. A. (2015) · Cited by 258
Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2002) · ICPSR Data Holdings · doi:10.3886/icpsr03355 · Cited by 250
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2011). Prisoners in 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice [NCJ 236096].
- Farabee, D., & Zhang, S. (2012). Effect-size inflation of post-hoc versus intent-to treat analyses of experimental offender interventions. Presented at the Stockholm Criminology Symposium, June 13, 2012. Stockholm, Sweden.
- Lattimore, P., & Visher, C. A. (2009). The multisite evaluation of SCORI: Summary and synthesis. Research Triangle Park: RTI International.
- Petersilia, J. (2006). Understanding California corrections. Irvine: California Policy Research Center, University of California, Irvine.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Experimental Evaluation of a Comprehensive Employment-Oriented Prisoner Re-entry Program
Cook, P. J., Kang, S., Braga, A. A., Ludwig, J., & O’Brien, M. E. (2015) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9242-5 · Cited by 172
Not Just Any Job Will Do: A Study on Employment Characteristics and Recidivism Risks After Release
Ramakers, A. A. T., Nieuwbeerta, P., van Wilsem, J., & Dirkzwager, A. (2016) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x16636141 · Cited by 138
Apel, R. J., & Horney, J. (2017) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12134 · Cited by 116
Newton, D. C., Day, A., Giles, M. J., Wodak, J., Graffam, J., & Baldry, E. (2016) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x16645083 · Cited by 98
Encouraging Desistance from Crime
Doleac, J. L. (2023) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20211536 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Farabee, D., Zhang, S. X., & Wright, B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- San Diego State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Farabee, David
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Criminology
- Published
- 2014-02-28
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-322
- ISSN
- 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3750
- OpenAlex
- W2026635069
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- prisoner reentry, recidivism, housing outcomes, employment effects, program evaluation, field experiments, community resources, rehabilitation programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
