Cited by 505Policing Practices and PerceptionsCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: a systematic review

Gill, Charlotte, Weisburd, David, Telep, Cody W., Vitter, Zoe, Bennett, Trevor·2014·Journal of Experimental Criminology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11292-014-9210-y

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., & Rothstein, H. R. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis, version 2). Englewood: Biostat.
  2. Cordner, G. W. (1999). Elements of community policing. In L. K. Gaines & G. W. Cordner (Eds.), Policing perspectives: An anthology (pp. 137–149). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
  3. Gill, C. (2014). Community crime prevention. In D. P. Farrington & D. L. Weisburd (Eds.), Systematic reviews in criminology: What have we learned?. New York: Springer (Forthcoming).
  4. Kelling, G. L., & Moore, M. H. (1988). From political to reform to community: The evolving strategy of police. In J. R. Greene & S. D. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality. New York: Praeger.
  5. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 10, 22–54.
  6. Mastrofski, S. D. (1988). Community policing as reform: A cautionary tale. In J. R. Greene & S. D. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality (pp. 47–68). New York: Praeger.
  7. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. (2012). Community-oriented policing defined. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
  8. Skogan, W. G. (2006b). Policing and community in Chicago: A tale of three cities. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Weisburd, D. L., & McElroy, J. (1988). Enacting the CPO role: Findings from the New York City Pilot Program in Community Policing. In J. Greene & S. Mastroski (Eds.), Community based policing: Rhetoric or reality? New York: Praeger.
  10. **Esbensen, F.-A. (1987). Foot patrols: Of what value? American Journal of Police, 6, 45–65.
  11. *Lindsay, B., & McGillis, D. (1986). Citywide community crime prevention: An assessment of the Seattle program. In D. P. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Community crime prevention: Does it work? (pp. 46–67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 505

Metadata

Authors
Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of South Wales (GB)
Corresponding author
Gill, Charlotte
Venue
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2014-08-02
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
399-428
ISSN
  • 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3750
OpenAlex
W2006140863
Cited by
486
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 7
FWCI
37.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
community policing, crime prevention, fear of crime, disorder, citizen satisfaction, police legitimacy, community participation, police-community relations, logic model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review