The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: a systematic review
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“prior research designs have not leveraged the random assignment of police–public contact to identify the causal effect of such interactions on individual-level attitudes toward the police (12–14).”
From A field experiment on community policing and police legitimacy (2019) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918 · Cited by 11,999
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings
Shrout, P. E. (1980) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(80)90063-4 · Cited by 6,091
Tyler, T. R. (2006) · doi:10.1515/9781400828609 · Cited by 5,156
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5664 · Cited by 4,081
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006) · doi:10.1002/9780470754887 · Cited by 3,586
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., & Rothstein, H. R. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis, version 2). Englewood: Biostat.
- Cordner, G. W. (1999). Elements of community policing. In L. K. Gaines & G. W. Cordner (Eds.), Policing perspectives: An anthology (pp. 137–149). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
- Gill, C. (2014). Community crime prevention. In D. P. Farrington & D. L. Weisburd (Eds.), Systematic reviews in criminology: What have we learned?. New York: Springer (Forthcoming).
- Kelling, G. L., & Moore, M. H. (1988). From political to reform to community: The evolving strategy of police. In J. R. Greene & S. D. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality. New York: Praeger.
- Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 10, 22–54.
- Mastrofski, S. D. (1988). Community policing as reform: A cautionary tale. In J. R. Greene & S. D. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality (pp. 47–68). New York: Praeger.
- Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. (2012). Community-oriented policing defined. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
- Skogan, W. G. (2006b). Policing and community in Chicago: A tale of three cities. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Weisburd, D. L., & McElroy, J. (1988). Enacting the CPO role: Findings from the New York City Pilot Program in Community Policing. In J. Greene & S. Mastroski (Eds.), Community based policing: Rhetoric or reality? New York: Praeger.
- **Esbensen, F.-A. (1987). Foot patrols: Of what value? American Journal of Police, 6, 45–65.
- *Lindsay, B., & McGillis, D. (1986). Citywide community crime prevention: An assessment of the Seattle program. In D. P. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Community crime prevention: Does it work? (pp. 46–67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–505 of 505
Policing Strategies, Perceptions of Police Performance, and Trust in Local Government
Branton, R. P., Carey, T. E., & Ramirez, M. (2026) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/10780874261490524
Chen, T., O’Leary, N., Green, S., & Darby, B. (2026) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci15100721
Sihite, D. T. S., & Melmambessy, M. S. I. (2026) · Golden Ratio of Data in Summary · doi:10.52970/grdis.v6i4.1412
Police Use of Social Media in Background Screening: An Organizational Analysis
Lu, H., Situ, X., & Hong, Q. (2026) · Criminal Justice Review · doi:10.1177/07340168261498430
Yecyec, K. O., Aguhar, D., Morga, J., & Flores, E. J. L. (2026) · International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies · doi:10.67903/ijroms0514
Metadata
- Authors
- Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of South Wales (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gill, Charlotte
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Criminology
- Published
- 2014-08-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-428
- ISSN
- 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3750
- OpenAlex
- W2006140863
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 37.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- community policing, crime prevention, fear of crime, disorder, citizen satisfaction, police legitimacy, community participation, police-community relations, logic model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review