The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Cooperation in research, development and innovation (RD&I) between universities or research institutes and industries plays a fundamental role in the economic development of a country. Industry benefits from state-of-the-art laboratories and technologies from academia, while institutes learn about business reality and market needs. Numerous barriers to the establishment and maintenance of these partnerships have been investigated and reported in the literature, but the information generated by these empirical studies is very fragmented and there is a need to consider the barriers systematically in order to clarify the topic. The aims of this systematic review were to analyze university-industry collaborations set up for the purpose of RD&I in an effort to recognize the barriers and facilitators of the process and to identify the approaches by which such barriers may be overcome. Following searches of the Scopus database and application of the exclusion criteria, 86 relevant articles were identified and submitted to bibliometric analysis. Subsequently, 75 articles were selected for in-depth content analysis, and the ideas embodied therein were presented in a structured and comprehensive manner. Barriers were evaluated according to three different theoretical perspectives, namely the triple helix and the entrepreneurial university, the relational social capital and value creation, and technology transfer and cultural differences. The facilitators were categorized as internal and external. The results obtained highlight the importance of fostering relational social capital and providing tax incentives to facilitate industry's pursuit of innovation through academia partnerships, and also show that collaborative barriers in RD&I may be overcome to some extent by starting with smaller projects and gradually increasing their complexity. Based on the findings outlined in this review, we propose various lines for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
Coleman, J. S. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228943 · Cited by 26,975
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 · Cited by 8,559
The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.332 · Cited by 4,553
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., et al. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 · Cited by 2,552
Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273 · Cited by 2,269
Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations
Etzkowitz, H. (2003) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/05390184030423002 · Cited by 1,687
University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x · Cited by 1,471
Who co-operates for innovation, and why
Tether, B. S. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00172-x · Cited by 1,433
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21419 · Cited by 1,427
Cited by
Romero-Sánchez, A., Perdomo-Charry, G., & Burbano-Vallejo, E. L. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27258 · Cited by 43
Educational Innovation Transforming Higher Education for Workforce Readiness
Singha, R., & Singha, S. (2024) · Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0517-1.ch003 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossoni, A. L., de Vasconcellos, E. P. G., & de Castilho Rossoni, R. L.
- Venue
- Management Review Quarterly
- Published
- 2023-04-26
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1841-1877
- ISSN
- 2198-1620 (ISSN-L)
- 2198-1639
- OpenAlex
- W4367059544
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1
- The paper
- Rossoni, A. L., de Vasconcellos, E. P. G., & de Castilho Rossoni, R. L. (2024). Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.