The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda
Open accessAbstract
Organizations increasingly rely on external sources of innovation via inter‐organizational network relationships. This paper explores the diffusion and characteristics of collaborative relationships between universities and industry, and develops a research agenda informed by an ‘open innovation’ perspective. A framework is proposed, distinguishing university–industry relationships from other mechanisms such as technology transfer or human mobility. On the basis of the existing body of research, the role of practices such as collaborative research, university–industry research centres, contract research and academic consulting is analysed. The evidence suggests that such university–industry relationships are widely practised, whereby differences exist across industries and scientific disciplines. While most existing research focuses on the effects of university–industry links on innovation‐specific variables such as patents or firm innovativeness, the organizational dynamics of these relationships remain under‐researched. A detailed research agenda addresses research needs in two main areas: search and match processes between universities and firms, and the organization and management of collaborative relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Toward a new economics of science
Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1 · Cited by 2,448
Wallsten, S. J. (2000) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2601030 · Cited by 1,068
Cited by
Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12102 · Cited by 995
Open innovation: The next decade
West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001 · Cited by 872
Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007 · Cited by 582
Innovation on demand—Can public procurement drive market success of innovations?
Aschhoff, B., & Sofka, W. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.011 · Cited by 435
Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships: a review
de Wit-de Vries, E., Dolfsma, W. A., van der Windt, H. J., & Gerkema, M. P. (2019) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9660-x · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-22
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 259-280
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W2085984666
- Cited by
- 1,471
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 59.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
- The paper
- Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.