Cited by 134Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Clinical diagnosis of sleep apnea based on single night of polysomnography vs. two nights of polysomnography

Ahmadi, Negar, Shapiro, Gilla K., Chung, Sharon A., Shapiro, Colin M.·2009·Sleep and Breathing

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) across two polysomnographies (PSGs) to examine AHI variability and impact on clinical diagnosis. Materials and methods Two-night PSGs of 193 sleep clinic patients were reviewed, and the AHI variability was analyzed. Anonymized records from five patients with significant night-to-night AHI variability were used in this study: the two-night PSGs from two patients were represented as four individual PSGs; the two-night PSG for two others were represented as being obtained from two different sleep clinics; the last patient's PSG was shown as a two-night study. Twenty-two sleep experts attending the Associated Professional Sleep Societies meeting were recruited to make diagnoses based on the PSGs. They were told that the PSGs were from seven patients: four with single-night PSG; two with two PSGs, each one from a different clinic; and one patient with a two-night PSG. Results Twenty-one percent of the 193 sleep clinic patients had a nightly PSG AHI variability of greater than 5. Forty-eight percent of all patients had a significantly higher AHI on the first night, and 41% had a significantly higher AHI on the second night. Using an AHI > 15 diagnostic criteria, sleep apnea would have been undetected in 20% (n = 39) of patients due to low AHI on one night. Furthermore, 13% of all patients had a more severe sleep apnea classification based on the second night of PSG. For the seven cases, 27-36% of sleep…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11325-008-0234-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmadi, N., Shapiro, G. K., Chung, S. A., & Shapiro, C. M.
Affiliations
University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Ahmadi, Negar
Venue
Sleep and Breathing
Published
2008-12-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
221-226
ISSN
  • 1520-9512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1709
OpenAlex
W2032190775
Cited by
134
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep And Breathing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
sleep apnea, apnea-hypopnea index, night-to-night variability, missed diagnosis, sleep apnea severity classification, sleep clinic patients, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Incidence, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review