CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of split-night versus traditional sleep studies on CPAP compliance

Collen, Jacob, Holley, Aaron, Lettieri, Christopher, Shah, Anita, Roop, Stuart·2010·Sleep and Breathing
DOI 10.1007/s11325-009-0294-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Split-night polysomnography allows for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea and titration of continuous positive airway pressure in a single study. However, there is concern that split-night studies do not provide sufficient time for optimal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration, which may lead to a poor initial experience with CPAP and potentially, worse adherence. Our goal was to determine whether CPAP use, after a split-night examination, is comparable to the use following separate diagnostic and titration studies. Methods We included consecutive patients presenting for follow-up 4-6 weeks after initiating CPAP therapy. Objective measures of CPAP use were recorded, and adherence to therapy was analyzed based on the initial method of diagnosis and titration-split-night versus dual-night study. Results A total of 400 patients (78% male, mean age 47 +/- 8 years) were included. Among the patients, 267 and 133 underwent split- and dual-night studies, respectively. The groups were similar at baseline; however, the average apnea-hypopnea index was significantly higher in the split-night group. Mean number of days between diagnosis and titration in the dual-night group was 80.5 days. There was no difference in therapeutic adherence between groups as measured by percentage of nights used (78.7% vs 77.5%; p = 0.42), hours per night used (3.9 vs 3.9; p = 0.95), or percentage of patients using continuous positive airway pressure for >4 hours per night for…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11325-009-0294-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. American Thoracic Society (1994) Indications and standards for use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in sleep apnea syndromes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150:1738–1745 · DOI
  2. Sullivan CE, Issa FG, Berthon-Jones M, Eves L (1981) Reversal of obstructive sleep apnoea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nares. Lancet 1(8225):862–865 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Meslier N, Lebrun T, Grillier-Lanoir V et al (1998) A French survey of 3, 225 patients treated with CPAP for obstructive sleep apnoea: benefits, tolerance, compliance and quality of life. Eur Respir J 12(1):185–192 · DOI
  4. He J, Kryger MH, Zorick FJ, Conway W, Roth T (1988) Mortality and apnea index in obstructive sleep apnea. Experience in 385 male patients. Chest 94(1):9–14 · DOI
  5. Mayer J, Becker H, Brandenburg U, Penzel T, Peter JH, von Wichert P (1991) Blood pressure and sleep apnea: results of long-term nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Cardiology 79(2):84–92 · DOI
  6. Wilcox I, Grunstein RR, Hedner JA et al (1993) Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure during sleep on 24-hour blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 16(6):539–544 · DOI
  7. Namen AM, Dunagan DP, Fleischer A et al (2002) Increased physician-reported sleep apnea: the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Chest 121(6):1741–1747 · DOI
  8. Patel NP, Ahmed M, Rosen I (2007) Split-night polysomnography. Chest 132(5):1664–1671 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ (2002) Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165(9):1217–1239 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Flemons WW, Douglas NJ, Kuna ST, Rodenstein DO, Wheatley J (2004) Access to diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169(6):668–672 · DOI
  11. Elshaug AG, Moss JR, Southcott AM (2005) Implementation of a split-night protocol to improve efficiency in assessment and treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Intern Med J 35(4):251–254 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Phillips B, Collop N, Strollo P (1996) Controversies in sleep disorders medicine. Pulmonologists respond!. Chest 110(6):1597–1602 · DOI
  13. Kushida CA, Littner MR, Morgenthaler T et al (2005) Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures: an update for 2005. Sleep 28(4):499–521 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Sanders MH, Kern NB, Costantino JP et al (1993) Adequacy of prescribing positive airway pressure therapy by mask for sleep apnea on the basis of a partial-night trial. Am Rev Respir Dis 147(5):1169–1174 · DOI
  15. Yamashiro Y, Kryger MH (1995) CPAP titration for sleep apnea using a split-night protocol. Chest 107(1):62–66 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Fanfulla F, Patruno V, Bruschi C, Rampulla C (1997) Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: is the “half-night polysomnography” an adequate method for evaluating sleep profile and respiratory events? Eur Respir J 10(8):1725–1729 · DOI
  17. Fleury B, Rakotonanahary D, Tehindrazanarivelo AD, Hausser-Hauw C, Lebeau B (1994) Long-term compliance to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (nCPAP) set up during a split-night polysomnography. Sleep 17(6):512–515 · DOI
  18. Strollo PJ Jr, Sanders MH, Costantino JP, Walsh SK, Stiller RA, Atwood CW Jr (1996) Split-night studies for the diagnosis and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep 19(10 Suppl):S255–S259 · DOI
  19. Drake CL, Day R, Hudgel D et al (2003) Sleep during titration predicts continuous positive airway pressure compliance. Sleep 26(3):308–311 · DOI
  20. Sanders MH, Constantino JP, Strollo PJ et al (2000) The impact of split-night polysomnography for diagnosis and positive pressure therapy titration on treatment acceptance and adherence in sleep apnea/hypopnea. Sleep 23(1):17–24 · DOI
  21. McArdle N, Grove A, Devereux G, Mackay-Brown L, Mackay T, Douglas NJ (2000) Split-night versus full-night studies for sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J 15(4):670–675 · DOI · Paper page
  22. EEG arousals: scoring rules and examples: a preliminary report from the Sleep Disorders Atlas Task Force of the American Sleep Disorders Association. Sleep, 15(2):173-184, 1992 · DOI
  23. Johns MW (1991) A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 14(6):540–545 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kribbs NB, Pack AI, Kline LR et al (1993) Objective measurement of patterns of nasal CPAP use by patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 147(4):887–895 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Sanders MH, Black J, Costantino JP, Kern N, Studnicki K, Coates J (1991) Diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing by half-night polysomnography. Am Rev Respir Dis 144(6):1256–1261 · DOI
  26. Rodway GW, Sanders MH (2003) The efficacy of split-night sleep studies. Sleep Med Rev 7(5):391–401 · DOI
  27. Lettieri CJ, Eliasson AH, Andrada T, Khramtsov A, Kristo DA (2005) Does zolpidem enhance the yield of polysomnography? J Clin Sleep Med 1(2):129–131 · DOI
  28. Lettieri CJ, Quast TN, Eliasson AH, Andrada T (2008) Eszopiclone improves overnight polysomnography and continuous positive airway pressure titration: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Sleep 31(9):1310–1316
  29. Wild MR, Engleman HM, Douglas NJ, Espie CA (2004) Can psychological factors help us to determine adherence to CPAP? A prospective study. Eur Respir J 24(3):461–465 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Collen, J., Holley, A., Lettieri, C., Shah, A., & Roop, S.
Affiliations
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Collen, Jacob
ORCID
Venue
Sleep and Breathing
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-08-28
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
93-99
ISSN
  • 1520-9512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1709
DOI
10.1007/s11325-009-0294-y
OpenAlex
W2010767066
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Sleep And Breathing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
split-night polysomnography, CPAP adherence, obstructive sleep apnea, apnea-hypopnea index, sleep apnea diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Appointments and Schedules, District of Columbia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Patient Compliance, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Body Mass Index, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review