Cited by 40Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disorders

Occupational screening for sleep disorders in 12-h shift nurses using the Berlin Questionnaire

Geiger-Brown, Jeanne, Rogers, Valerie E., Han, Kihye, Trinkoff, Alison, Bausell, R. Barker, Scharf, Steven M.·2013·Sleep And Breathing

Abstract

Background The Berlin Questionnaire has been validated as a screening tool for sleep apnea in clinical samples, but no occupational studies have reported screening validity parameters for this instrument. The objectives of this pilot study were to describe the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing symptoms in registered nurses and examine the validity of the Berlin Questionnaire to screen for sleep apnea in this chronically partially sleep-deprived group. Validity parameters for the Berlin Questionnaire are tabulated for published studies to 2012.Methods Twenty-one female nurses working full time 12-h shifts underwent overnight, in-laboratory polysomnography to identify sleep disorders and completed a Berlin Questionnaire.Results By polysomnogram, the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing [Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) ≥ 5] was 43 %, although by the Berlin Questionnaire only 24 % were deemed high risk. The sensitivity of the Berlin Questionnaire to detect high-risk subjects (RDI > 5) was 0.33, with a specificity of 0.83, a positive predictive value of 0.60, and negative predictive value of 0.63. Berlin criterion 3 (obesity or hypertension) performed the best for predicting sleep apnea in 12-h shift nurses.Conclusions Although the Berlin Questionnaire produced valuable data about symptoms of sleep apnea in this population, it had a high proportion of false negatives. To improve its sensitivity for screening health care workers for sleep apnea, it must better capture symptoms specific to this population. Increasing the weighting of Berlin criterion 3 items should be considered to improve its psychometric properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11325-012-0705-3

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For nurses, shift work and long work hours are related to adverse health outcomes and indicators of reduced functioning.

    “For nurses, shift work and long work hours have been shown to be related to adverse health outcomes and indicators of reduced functioning.208–217”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [215]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geiger-Brown, J., Rogers, V. E., Han, K., Trinkoff, A., Bausell, R. B., & Scharf, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Geiger-Brown, Jeanne
Venue
Sleep And Breathing
Published
2012-04-26
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
381-388
ISSN
  • 1520-9512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1709
OpenAlex
W1987977904
Cited by
40
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep And Breathing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k12rr023250-05)
  • National Center for Research Resources (5K12RR023250-05)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
Berlin questionnaire, sleep apnea screening, shift work, nurses, 12-hour shifts, sleep-disordered breathing, occupational health, screening validity, sensitivity and specificity, respiratory disturbance index, Berlin criteria, obesity, hypertension, sleep deprivation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Occupational Diseases, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Snoring, Baltimore, Reproducibility of Results, Polysomnography, Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review