Need for relevant timescales when crediting temporary carbon storage
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In many cases, sequestration rates decline to zero as the SOC stored reaches a new equilibrium.
“In many cases, sequestration rates decline to zero as the SOC stored reaches a new equilibrium.”
From Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Soil C-sequestration is usually assumed to be temporary and there is a common perception that there is an upper limit to the amount of carbon that can be sequestered.
“Soil C-sequestration, however, is usually assumed to be temporary and it is a common perception that there is an upper limit to the amount of C that can be sequestrated14.”
From Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Soil C-sequestration is a dynamic process, and hence, SOC stocks are constantly changing.
“Soil C-sequestration is a dynamic process, and hence, SOC stocks are constantly changing, which raises concerns on the relevant timescales when crediting temporary C-sequestration14.”
From Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Multiple timescales for neutralization of fossil fuel CO <sub>2</sub>
Archer, D., Kheshgi, H., & Maier‐Reimer, E. (1997) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/97gl00168 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guest, G., Bright, R. M., Cherubini, F., & Strømman, A. H. (2013) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.002 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Temporalis, a generic method and tool for dynamic Life Cycle Assessment
Cardellini, G., Mutel, C. L., Vial, E., & Muys, B. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.044 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions
Wang, Y., de Boer, I. J. M., Persson, U. M., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Cederberg, C., Gerber, P. J., Smith, P., & van Middelaar, C. E. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43452-3 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jørgensen, S. V., & Hauschild, M. Z.
- Affiliations
- Novozymes (Denmark) (DK)
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Jørgensen, Susanne V.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Published
- 2012-11-13
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 747-754
- ISSN
- 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7502
- OpenAlex
- W2005664338
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Keywords
- carbon crediting, carbon footprint calculation, carbon cycle, PAS 2050, climate change mitigation, tipping points, atmospheric CO2, long-term climate impacts, fossil fuel emissions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
