Cited by 57Environmental Impact and SustainabilityEngineering and Materials Science StudiesMaterial Selection and Properties

Life cycle assessment of automotive lightweighting through polymers under US boundary conditions

Koffler, Christoph·2014·The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11367-013-0652-7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koffler, C.
Corresponding author
Koffler, Christoph
Venue
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2013-10-02
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
538-545
ISSN
  • 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7502
OpenAlex
W2068973049
Cited by
57
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Engineering and Materials Science Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Selection and Properties
Keywords
automotive lightweighting, glass fiber, steel replacement, fuel economy, global warming potential, primary energy demand, acidification potential, end-of-life treatment, cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment, engine displacement, gear ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review