How can LCA include prospective elements to assess emerging technologies and system transitions? The 76th LCA Discussion Forum on Life Cycle Assessment, 19 November 2020
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ex-ante framework lacks foresight in assessing the potential and adequacy of the process/product being developed in a future scenario.
“However, one of the main weaknesses of using this framework is the lack of foresight in assessing the potential and adequacy of the process/product being developed in a future scenario [11,122,123].”
From Assessing the future prospects of emerging technologies for shipping and aviation biofuels: A critical review (2024) · cites this paper as [123]
Cites
The Activity Browser — An open source LCA software building on top of the brightway framework
Steubing, B. R. P., de Koning, D., Haas, A., & Mutel, C. (2019) · Software Impacts · doi:10.1016/j.simpa.2019.100012 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Self-citationMendoza Beltran, A., Cox, B., Mutel, C., van Vuuren, D. P., Font Vivanco, D., Deetman, S., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Guinée, J., & Tukker, A. (2020) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12825 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
van der Hulst, M. K., Huijbregts, M. A. J., van Loon, N., Theelen, M., Kootstra, L., Bergesen, J. D., & Hauck, M. (2020) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13027 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationJoyce, P. J., & Björklund, A. (2021) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13115 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arias, A., Nika, C.-E., Vasilaki, V., Feijoo, G., Moreira, M. T., & Katsou, E. (2024) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114427 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adrianto, L. R., van der Hulst, M. K., Tokaya, J. P., Arvidsson, R., Blanco, C. F., Caldeira, C., Guillén-Gonsálbez, G., Sala, S., Steubing, B., Buyle, M., Kaddoura, M., Navarre, N. H., Pedneault, J., Pizzol, M., Salieri, B., van Harmelen, T., & Hauck, M.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- Leiden University (NL)
- European Commission (BE)
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- CIRAIG (CA)
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Empa (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Hauck, Mara
- ORCID
- Venue
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Published
- 2021-07-20
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1541-1544
- ISSN
- 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7502
- OpenAlex
- W3185446032
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (730471, 812580)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Keywords
- prospective life cycle assessment, emerging technologies, system transition, future scenarios, data sharing, methodological recommendations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
