Cited by 20Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsWater Quality and Resources Studies

Likely controls on dissolved reactive phosphorus concentrations in baseflow of an agricultural stream

Open access
McDowell, Richard W., Depree, Craig, Stenger, Roland·2020·Journal of Soils and Sediments

Abstract

Purpose: High baseflow phosphorus (P) concentrations increase the likelihood of periphyton blooms. Several physical and chemical factors can control baseflow P concentrations such as hydraulic exchange with groundwater, particle size-sorting, redox chemistry and different sediment sources. We hypothesized that of these sources, anoxic sediments would allow P-rich groundwater to influence baseflow P concentrations the most and that the measurement of the equilibrium P concentration (EPC 0) of sediments under oxic conditions would not predict P release in anaerobic sediment or baseflow P concentrations. Materials and methods: At four locations along an agricultural stream, we measured dissolved reactive P (DRP), pH, iron, manganese, sulphate, nitrate and dissolved oxygen in streamflow and hyporheic water at 0–200, 200–400 and 400–800 mm depths and P fractions and EPC 0 in sediment samples from the 0–200, 200–400 and 400–800 mm depths. Results and discussion: Concentrations of DRP in streamflow and shallow hyporheic zone water increased downstream and were mirrored by concentrations in shallow sediment, EPC 0 measurements of oxic sediments and deeper hyporheic waters. Groundwater samples and the EPC 0 in deeper sediments did not show a pattern or residence time consistent with the supply of P to baseflow despite deeper sediment being anoxic and less likely to sorb upwelling P. There was also no change in pH or particle size downstream ruling out the degassing of groundwater or sediment size-sorting as an influence. However, the composition of sediment and underlying lithology of the catchment pointed to sediment downstream that was different to upstream sediment in that it could store and release more P. Conclusions: Given the strong influence of sediment source on baseflow P concentrations, efforts to decrease the likelihood of periphyton blooms under baseflow should focus on reducing the erosion of P-rich sediment. Furthermore, the presence of oxic conditions in surface sediment meant that there was a relationship between EPC 0 and hyporheic water P concentrations. However, mixed oxic/anoxic conditions in deeper layer may require EPC 0, or release rates, to be measured under reducing conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11368-020-02644-w

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recovery timescales from nutrient and other forms of pollution are often difficult to predict because of legacy effects.

    “Recovery timescales from nutrient and other forms of pollution are often difficult to predict because of legacy effects, whereby nutrients stored in sediments can be mobilized under certain physical and chemical conditions [144][145][146] or stored long-term, resulting in slow response times to changed nutrient loads 132,147 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [146]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hewitt AE (2010) New Zealand soil classification. Landcare research science series, 3rd edn. Manaaki Whenua press, Landcare research, Lincoln, New Zealand
  2. 03615995002900060025x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDowell, R. W., Depree, C., & Stenger, R.
Affiliations
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
  • DairyNZ (NZ)
  • Lincoln Agritech (New Zealand) (NZ)
Corresponding author
McDowell, Richard W.
Venue
Journal of Soils and Sediments
Published
2020-05-06
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
3254-3265
ISSN
  • 1439-0108 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7480
OpenAlex
W3021275695
Cited by
20
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Soils and Sediments (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • AgResearch
Funders
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (LVLX1802, C10X1507)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
Keywords
soluble reactive phosphorus, baseflow, agricultural streams, hyporheic zone, groundwater exchange, anoxic sediments, equilibrium phosphorus concentration, sediment phosphorus release, sediment erosion, redox conditions, sediment sources, phosphorus sorption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review