Cited by 260Motor Control and AdaptationEmbodied and Extended CognitionAction Observation and Synchronization

Dynamics systems vs. optimal control — a unifying view

Open access
Schaal, Stefan, Mohajerian, Peyman, Ijspeert, Auke·2007·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

In the past, computational motor control has been approached from at least two major frameworks: the dynamic systems approach and the viewpoint of optimal control. The dynamic system approach emphasizes motor control as a process of self-organization between an animal and its environment. Nonlinear differential equations that can model entrainment and synchronization behavior are among the most favorable tools of dynamic systems modelers. In contrast, optimal control approaches view motor control as the evolutionary or development result of a nervous system that tries to optimize rather general organizational principles, e.g., energy consumption or accurate task achievement. Optimal control theory is usually employed to develop appropriate theories. Interestingly, there is rather little interaction between dynamic systems and optimal control modelers as the two approaches follow rather different philosophies and are often viewed as diametrically opposing. In this paper, we develop a computational approach to motor control that offers a unifying modeling framework for both dynamic systems and optimal control approaches. In discussions of several behavioral experiments and some theoretical and robotics studies, we demonstrate how our computational ideas allow both the representation of self-organizing processes and the optimization of movement based on reward criteria. Our modeling framework is rather simple and general, and opens opportunities to revisit many previous modeling…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6123(06)65027-9

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This perspective could reconcile some differences between dynamic systems and optimal control treatments of computational motor control.

    “This perspective could reconcile some differences between dynamic systems and optimal control treatments of computational motor control”

    From Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation (2010) · cites this paper as Schaal et al. 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaal, S., Mohajerian, P., & Ijspeert, A.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Schaal, Stefan
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2007
Volume
165
Pages
425-445
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1516801383
Cited by
260
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
18.66
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency
  • Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
computational motor control, dynamic systems approach, optimal control, self-organization, nonlinear differential equations, energy consumption, robotics
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Simulation, Environment, Humans, Models, Biological, Motor Activity, Reward, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review