Cited by 20Philosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationLogic and Philosophy of SciencePhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Inferential Account of Model Explanation

Fang, Wei·2019·Philosophia

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11406-018-9958-9

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Frisch, M. F. (1998). Theories, models, and explanation. Berkeley: University of California.
  2. Parker, W. S. (2003). Computer modeling in climate science: experiment, explanation, pluralism. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  3. Suárez, M. (2016). “Representation in science.” In The Oxford handbook of philosophy of science, by Paul Humphreys, 441–460. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fang, W.
Affiliations
Tongji University (CN)
Corresponding author
Fang, Wei
Venue
Philosophia
Published
2018-03-08
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
99-116
ISSN
  • 0048-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-9274
OpenAlex
W2791542748
Cited by
20
References
78
Citations by year
2024: 13 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophia (publishedVersion)
  • PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Social Science Fund of China (14ZDB018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
model explanation, scientific representation, counterfactual reasoning, hypothetical reasoning, agent-based modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review