Cited by 387

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Galilean idealization

McMullin, Ernan·1985·Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0039-3681(85)90003-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Drake translation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967), p. 203
  2. The Assayer, in The Controversy on the Comets of 1618, S. Drake (translation) Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press), p. 183
  3. Koertge, 1977, Galileo and the problem of accidents, J. Hist. Ideas, 38, 389, 10.2307/2708671 · DOI
  4. Koertge, 1977, Galileo and the problem of accidents, J. Hist. Ideas, 38, 397, 10.2307/2708671 · DOI
  5. Archimedes, 1588, On Plane Equilibrium
  6. Spector, 1965, Models and theories, Br. J. Phil. Sci., 16, 121, 10.1093/bjps/XVI.62.121 · DOI
  7. Achinstein, 1965, Theoretical models, Br. J. Phil. Sci., 16, 102, 10.1093/bjps/XVI.62.102 · DOI
  8. Redhead, 1980, Models in physics, Br. J. Phil. Sci., 31, 145, 10.1093/bjps/31.2.145 · DOI
  9. E. McMullin, ‘What do physical models tell us?’, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, B. van Rootselaar (ed.) (Amsterdam: North Holldnd), vol. 3, pp. 389–396 · DOI
  10. E. McMullin, ‘What do physical models tell us?’, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, B. van Rootselarr (ed.) (Amsterdam: North Holland), vol. 3, pp. 389–396 · DOI
  11. Koyré, 1953, An experiment in measurement, Proc. American Philos. Society, 97, 223
  12. T.B. Settle, Galileo's use of experiment as a tool of investigation’, Galileo, Man of Science,pp. 315–337
  13. Naylor, 1974, Galileo and the problem of free fall, Br. J. Hist. Sci., 7, 105, 10.1017/S0007087400013108 · DOI
  14. Naylor, 1974, Galileo and the problem of free fall, Br. J. Hist. Sci., 7, 197, 10.1017/S0007087400013108 · DOI
  15. Naylor, 1974, Galileo and the problem of free fall, Br. J. Hist. Sci., 7, 268, 10.1017/S0007087400013108 · DOI
  16. Naylor, 1974, Galileo and the problem of free fall, Br. J. Hist. Sci., 7, 117, 10.1017/S0007087400013108 · DOI
  17. Naylor, 1974, Galileo and the problem of free fall, Br. J. Hist. Sci., 7, 197, 10.1017/S0007087400013108 · DOI
  18. 1931, The conflict between Aristotelian and Galilean modes of thinking in contemporary psychology, J. Gen. Psych., 5, 141, 10.1080/00221309.1931.9918387 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McMullin, E.
Venue
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
247-273
ISSN
0039-3681
Cited by
387
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review