Cited by 92Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and self-regulated learning in online academic information searching

Chiu, Yen-Lin, Liang, Jyh-Chong, Tsai, Chin-Chung·2013·Metacognition and Learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11409-013-9103-x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiu, Y.-L., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Tsai, Chin-Chung
Venue
Metacognition and Learning
Published
2013-06-27
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
235-260
ISSN
  • 1556-1623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-1631
OpenAlex
W1983569108
Cited by
92
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Metacognition and Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
epistemological beliefs, student self-regulation, online information searching, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review