What are the metacognitive costs of young children’s overconfidence?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies investigating whether monitoring might be a predictor of executive functions found no significant link.
“However, previous studies investigating if monitoring might be a predictor of EF found no significant link.”
From Longitudinal associations between executive functions and metacognitive monitoring in 5- to 8-year-olds (2022) · cites this paper as Destan & Roebers (2015)
Destan & Roebers (2015) reported that global monitoring was no significant predictor of EF in 6-years-old children, and also the over-and underestimation of children's performance was not significantly linked to EF.
“Destan & Roebers (2015) reported that global monitoring was no significant predictor of EF in 6-years-old children, and also the over-and underestimation of children's performance was not significantly linked to EF.”
From Longitudinal associations between executive functions and metacognitive monitoring in 5- to 8-year-olds (2022) · cites this paper as Destan & Roebers (2015)
In 6-year-old children, neither global monitoring nor over- and underestimation of performance was significantly linked to executive functions.
“In the study of Destan & Roebers (2015), neither global monitoring nor the over-and underestimation of children's performance was significantly linked to EF in 6-years-old children.”
From Longitudinal associations between executive functions and metacognitive monitoring in 5- to 8-year-olds (2022) · cites this paper as Destan & Roebers (2015)
Previous studies either did not include a shifting measure or used a composite score for EF.
“Regarding the relation between shifting and MC, there is not much known since previous studies either did not include a shifting measure (Bryce et al., 2015) or used a composite score for EF (Destan & Roebers, 2015;Marulis & Nelson, 2021).”
From Longitudinal associations between executive functions and metacognitive monitoring in 5- to 8-year-olds (2022) · cites this paper as Destan & Roebers, 2015
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798 · see citing works
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · see citing works
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411429458 · Cited by 3,944 · see citing works
Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007 · Cited by 1,294 · see citing works
Test prediction and performance in a classroom context.
Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study
Metcalfe, J. (2009) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Roebers, C. M., Cimeli, P., Röthlisberger, M., & Neuenschwander, R. (2012) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-012-9089-9 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Looking at Mental Effort Appraisals through a Metacognitive Lens: Are they Biased?
Scheiter, K., Ackerman, R., & Hoogerheide, V. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09555-9 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Danovitch, J. H., Fisher, M., Schroder, H., Hambrick, D. Z., & Moser, J. (2019) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12960 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Kälin, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09306-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Destan, N., & Roebers, C. M.
- Venue
- Metacognition and Learning
- Published
- 2015-02-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-374
- ISSN
- 1556-1623
- 1556-1631
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
