Cited by 13Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHealth Policy Implementation SciencePatient Safety and Medication Errors

Provider opinions of the acceptability of Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) Tool and the ASQ Brief Suicide Safety Assessment (BSSA) for universal suicide risk screening in community healthcare: Potential barriers and necessary elements for future implementation

Christensen LeCloux, Mary, Aguinaldo, Laika D., Lanzillo, Elizabeth C., Horowitz, Lisa M.·2022·The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

Abstract

A convenience sample of community health care providers (N = 19) was asked to preview and rate the acceptability of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool and the ASQ Brief Suicide Safety Assessment (BSSA) guide. Providers were also asked about potential barriers to implementation. The majority of participants stated they would be comfortable screening for suicide with the ASQ tool (78.9%; N = 15), that they would recommend the ASQ tool and the BSSA to colleagues (84.2%; N = 16), and that they were "satisfied" or "highly satisfied" with the ASQ and BSSA (88.2%; N = 13). Barriers to implementation reported included a lack of knowledge regarding suicide risk screening and lack of access to behavioral health resources. Education regarding the ASQ, the BSSA, and suicide risk screening are highlighted as crucial elements for future implementation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11414-022-09787-3

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen LeCloux, M., Aguinaldo, L. D., Lanzillo, E. C., & Horowitz, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Catholic University of America (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Published
2022-03-09
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
346-363
ISSN
  • 1094-3412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3308
OpenAlex
W4220750472
Cited by
13
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
WV Clinical and Translational Science Institute (C1006000AW)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
suicide risk screening, provider acceptability, implementation barriers, suicide prevention, provider education
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Community Health Services, Health Personnel, Humans, Mass Screening, Personal Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review