Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response

Zeidler, Dana L.·2016·Cultural Studies of Science Education
DOI 10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. AAAS. (1990). The liberal art of science: Agenda for action. Washington, DC: AAAS.
  2. Cartwright, C. C., & Simpson, T. L. (2001). The relationship of moral judgment development and teaching effectiveness of student teachers. Education, 111, 139–144.
  3. Fensham, P. J. (2007). Values in the measurement of students’ science achievement in TIMSS and PISA. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 215–229). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. · doi:10.1163/9789087901677_019
  4. Fountain, R. M. (1998). Sociologics: An analytical tool for examining socioscientific discourse. Research in Science Education, 28, 110–132. doi: 10.1007/BF02461646 . · doi:10.1007/bf02461646
  5. Friedrich, P. (1992). Interpretation and vision: A critique of cryptopositivism. Cultural Anthropology, 7, 211–231. doi: 10.1525/can.1992.7.2.02a00040 . · doi:10.1525/can.1992.7.2.02a00040
  6. Fulton, K., & Britton, T. (2011). STEM teachers in professional learning communities: Good teachers to great teaching. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
  7. Green, T. F. (1999). Voices: The educational formation of conscience. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.
  8. Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  9. MacCullum, J. A. (1993). Teacher reasoning and moral judgment in the context of student discipline situations. Journal of Moral Education, 22, 3–28. doi: 10.1080/0305724930220101 . · doi:10.1080/0305724930220101
  10. National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying effective approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  11. Wingo, G. M. (1974). Philosophies of education. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
  12. Zeidler, D. L., Berkowitz, M., & Bennett, K. (2014). Thinking (scientifically) responsibly: The cultivation of character in a global science education community. In M. P. Mueller, D. J. Tippins, & A. J. Steward (Eds.), Assessing schools for generation R (responsibility): A guide to legislation and school policy in science education (pp. 83–99). The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_7 . · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_7

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Zeidler, D. L.
Venue
Cultural Studies of Science Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-06-26
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
11-26
ISSN
  • 1871-1502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1871-1510
DOI
10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z
OpenAlex
W2047697290
Cited by
340
References
54
FWCI
51.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z
The paper
Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.