Cited by 124Online and Blended LearningTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation during COVID-19 pandemic

Shifting digital, shifting context: (re)considering teacher professional development for online and blended learning in the COVID-19 era

Open access
Lockee, Barbara B.·2021·Educational Technology Research and Development

Abstract

This paper is in response to the manuscript entitled, "Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review" (Philipsen et al. in Educ Technol Res Dev 67:1145-1174, 2019) from a research perspective. The impact of this study is that it resulted in a guiding framework for teacher professional development (TPD) for online and blended learning (OBL). The basis of this study may be applied to explore the quick shift to digital teaching and learning amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. A potential limitation of the resulting framework in this study is that TPD for OBL needs may currently differ, as teachers are experiencing appreciably different learning and performance contexts related to the mandated shift in professional practice to address continuity of instruction. The application of the methodology in this study combined with quick response research approaches (Quarantelli, in: Stallings (ed) Methods of disaster research, Philadelphia, Xlibris, 2002) could potentially extend the Philipsen et al. (Educ Technol Res Dev 67:1145-1174, 2019) TPD framework to address educator preparation for successful professional practice in online and blended environments in times of crisis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-020-09836-8

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technological support, when disconnected from actual course practice, readily leads to fragmented learning; embedded, contextualized, and feedback-driven forms of development are more effective in helping new faculty move from operational competence to pedagogical competence.

    “Studies indicate that technological support, when disconnected from actual course practice, readily leads to fragmented learning; by contrast, embedded, contextualized, and feedback-driven forms of development are more effective in helping new faculty move from operational competence to pedagogical competence (9, 10).”

    From Reframing faculty development for digital transformation and generative AI in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Richardson, V. (2007). Teacher renewal: What is it? How is it engendered. In Teacher induction, mentoring, and renewal: Proceedings of the academic symposium (pp. 77–90).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lockee, B. B.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Lockee, Barbara B.
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2020-10-06
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
17-20
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W3092455210
Cited by
124
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 1
FWCI
36.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
Keywords
teacher professional development, online learning, blended learning, COVID-19 pandemic, digital teaching, teacher preparation, crisis education, professional practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review