CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Field experiment on a robust hierarchical metropolitan quantum cryptography network

Xu, FangXing, Chen, Wei, Wang, Shuang, Yin, ZhenQiang, Zhang, Yang, Liu, Yun, Zhou, Zheng, Zhao, YiBo, Li, HongWei, Liu, Dong, Han, ZhengFu, Guo, GuangCan·2009·Chinese Science Bulletin
DOI 10.1007/s11434-009-0526-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11434-009-0526-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exploiting hyperentangled photons has led to complete Bell measurement demonstrations in orbital angular momentum/polarization, momentum/polarization and time/polarization.

    “A solution to this issue consists in exploiting hyperentangled photons [44], leading to complete BM demonstrations in orbital angular momentum/polarization [324], momentum/polarization [325] and time/polarization [326,327].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [325]

    Citation [44] is attached to exploiting hyperentangled photons as a solution; the separate demonstration claims have other citations. Our copy’s Technical introduction (§1.1; page unavailable) describes a Faraday–Michelson interferometer for phase-coded quantum key distribution, not hyperentangled photons or complete Bell measurements. Searches for those terms found no passage addressing the attributed solution. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Muller A, Herzog T, Huttner B, et al. “Plug and play” systems for quantum cryptography. Appl Phys Lett, 1997, 70: 793–795 · DOI
  2. Gobby C, Yuan Z L, Shields A J. Quantum key distribution over 122 km of standard telecom fiber. Appl Phys Lett, 2004, 84: 3762–3764 · DOI
  3. Mo X F, Zhu B, Han Z F, et al. Faraday-Michelson system for quantum cryptography. Opt Lett, 2005, 30: 2632–2634 · DOI
  4. Zhao Y, Qi B, Ma X F, et al. Experimental quantum key distribution with decoy states. Phys Rev Lett, 2006, 96: 070502 · DOI
  5. Takesue H, Nam S W, Zhang Q, et al. Quantum key distribution over a 40-dB channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors. Nat Photonics, 2007, 1: 343–348 · DOI
  6. Zeng G H, Keitel C H. Arbitrated quantum-signature scheme. Phys Rev A, 2002, 65: 042312 · DOI
  7. Chen K, Lo H K. Multi-partite quantum cryptographic protocols with noisy GHZ states. Quant Inform Comput, 2007, 7: 689–715
  8. Xiao L, Long G L, Deng F G, et al. Efficient multiparty quantum-secret sharing schemes. Phys Rev A, 2004, 69: 052307 · DOI
  9. Yan F L, Gao T, Li Y C. Quantum secret sharing between multiparty and multiparty with four states. Sci China Ser G, 2007, 50: 572–580 · DOI
  10. Townsend P D, Phoenix S J D, Blow K J, et al. Quantum cryptography for multi-user passive optical networks. Electron Lett, 1994, 30: 1875 · DOI
  11. Townsend P D. Quantum cryptography on multi-user optical fibre networks. Nature, 1997, 385: 47–49 · DOI
  12. Elliott C. Building the quantum network. New J Phys, 2002, 4: 46.1–46.12 · DOI
  13. Chen W, Han Z F, Zhang T, et al. Field experimental “star type” metropolitan quantum key distribution network. IEEE Photonics Tech Lett, 2009, 21: 575–577 · DOI
  14. Poppe A, Peev M, Maurhart O. Outline of the SECOQC quantumkey- distribution network in Vienna. Int J Quantum Inf, 2008, 6: 209–218 · DOI
  15. Chen T Y, Liang H, Liu Y, et al. Field test of a practical secure communication network with decoy-state quantum cryptography. Optics Express, 2009, 17: 6540–6549 · DOI
  16. Han Z F, Mo X F, Gui Y Z, et al. Stability of phase-modulated quantum key distribution systems. Appl Phys Lett, 2005, 86: 221103 · DOI
  17. Chen W, Han Z F, Mo X F, et al. Active phase compensation of quantum key distribution system. Chinese Sci Bull, 2008, 53: 1310–1314 · DOI
  18. Subacius D, Zavriyev A, Trifonov A. Backscattering limitation for fiber-optic quantum key distribution systems. Appl Phys Lett, 2005, 86: 011103 · DOI
  19. Zhang T, Mo X F, Han Z F, et al. Extensible router for a quantum key distribution network. Phys Lett A, 2008, 372: 3957–3962 · DOI
  20. Tang X, Ma L J, Mink A, et al. Demonstration of an active quantum key distribution network. Proc SPIE, 2006, 6305: 630506 · DOI
  21. Wen H, Han Z F, Guo G C, et al. The queuing model for quantum key distribution network. Chin Phys B, 2009, 18: 46–50 · DOI
  22. Wang W Y, Wang C, Zhang G Y, et al. Arbitrarily long distance quantum communication using inspection and power insertion. Chinese Sci Bull, 2009, 54: 158–162 · DOI
  23. Wen H, Han Z F, Zhao Y B, et al. Multiple stochastic paths scheme on partially-trusted relay quantum key distribution network. Sci China Ser F, 2009, 52: 18–22 · DOI
  24. Hwang W Y. Quantum key distribution with high loss: Toward global secure communication. Phys Rev Lett, 2003, 91: 057901 · DOI
  25. Wang X B. Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 94: 230503 · DOI
  26. Lo H K, Ma X F, Chen K. Decoy state quantum key distribution. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 94: 230504 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Wang X B. Decoy-state protocol for quantum cryptography with four different intensities of coherent light. Phys Rev A, 2005, 72: 012322 · DOI
  28. Gottesman D, Lo H K, Lutkenhaus N, et al. Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices. Quant Inform Comput, 2004, 5: 325–360
  29. Ma X F, Qi B, Zhao Y, et al. Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution. Phys Rev A, 2005, 72: 012326 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xu, F., Chen, W., Wang, S., Yin, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, Z., Zhao, Y., Li, H., Liu, D., Han, Z., & Guo, G.
Venue
Chinese Science Bulletin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-08-30
Volume
54
Issue
17
Pages
2991-2997
ISSN
  • 1001-6538
  • 1861-9541
DOI
10.1007/s11434-009-0526-3
Cited by
116
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review