Cited by 635Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesAdvancements in Battery Materials

A brief review on key technologies in the battery management system of electric vehicles

Open access
Liu, Kailong, Li, Kang, Peng, Qiao, Zhang, Cheng·2019·Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

Batteries have been widely applied in many high-power applications, such as electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid electric vehicles, where a suitable battery management system (BMS) is vital in ensuring safe and reliable operation of batteries. This paper aims to give a brief review on several key technologies of BMS, including battery modelling, state estimation and battery charging. First, popular battery types used in EVs are surveyed, followed by the introduction of key technologies used in BMS. Various battery models, including the electric model, thermal model and coupled electro-thermal model are reviewed. Then, battery state estimations for the state of charge, state of health and internal temperature are comprehensively surveyed. Finally, several key and traditional battery charging approaches with associated optimization methods are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11465-018-0516-8

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML methods can be utilized for both SOH estimation and RUL prediction, but there is a large difference between the two applications in terms of input features and desired output.

    “While ML methods can be utilized for both SOH estimation and RUL prediction [122,123], there is a large difference between the two applications in terms of input features and the desired output.”
  • Li-ion batteries have a longer cycle life than other secondary battery types, which is a major benefit for guaranteeing that electric vehicles have an extended lifespan (usually 6-10 years).

    “Table 3 lists the salient features of several popular battery types showing that Li-ion batteries have a longer cycle life than other kinds, which is a major benefit for guaranteeing that electric vehicles (EVs) having an extended lifespan (usually 6 -10 years) [14 -16].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lin X, Perez H E, Mohan S, et al. A lumped-parameter electro- thermal model for cylindrical batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 257: 1-11
  2. Lin X, Perez H E, Siegel J B, et al. Online parameterization of lumped thermal dynamics in cylindrical lithium ion batteries for core temperature estimation and health monitoring. IEEE Transac- tions on Control Systems Technology, 2013, 21(5): 1745-1755
  3. Berndt D. Maintenance-free Batteries: Lead-acid, Nickel-cad- mium, Nickel-metal Hydride. Taunton: Research Studies Press, 1997 105.
  4. Perez H, Hu X, Dey S, et al. Optimal charging of Li-ion batteries with coupled electro-thermal-aging dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2017, 66(9): 7761-7770

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, K., Li, K., Peng, Q., & Zhang, C.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Li, Kang
Venue
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering
Published
2018-04-02
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
47-64
ISSN
  • 2095-0233 (ISSN-L)
  • 2095-0241
OpenAlex
W2796379873
Cited by
635
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
21.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61640316, EP/L 001063/1, 61673256, 61533010)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L001063/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
battery management systems, electric vehicles, battery modeling, electro-thermal modeling, thermal modeling, state of charge estimation, state of health estimation, battery temperature prediction, battery charging, charging optimization, hybrid electric vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review