Cited by 378Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

Data-driven state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries: Algorithms, implementation factors, limitations and future trends

Hossain Lipu, M.S., Hannan, M.A., Hussain, Aini, Ayob, Afida, Saad, Mohamad H.M., Karim, Tahia F., How, Dickson N.T.·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Global carbon emissions caused by fossil fuels and diesel-based vehicles have urged the necessity to move toward the development of electric vehicles and related battery storage systems. Lithium-ion batteries are the ideal candidate for electric vehicle due to their superior performance with regard to high energy density and long lifespan. The state of charge of lithium-ion batteries is one of the crucial evaluation indicators of the battery management system that confirms the extended battery life, better charging-discharging profiles, and safe driving of electric vehicles. However, the accuracy of the state of charge is influenced by several issues such as battery aging cycles, noise effects, and temperature impacts. Therefore, this review presents a detailed classification of the recent data-driven state of charge estimation highlighting algorithm, input features, configuration, execution process, strength, weakness and estimation error. This review critically investigates the various key implementation factors of the data-driven algorithms in terms of data preprocessing, hyperparameter adjustment, activation function, evaluation criteria, computational cost and robustness validation under uncertainties. In addition, the review explores the deficiencies of existing data-driven state of charge estimation algorithms to identify the gaps for future research. Finally, the review provides some effective future directions that would be beneficial to the automobile researchers and industrialists to design an accurate and robust state of charge estimation technique toward future sustainable electric vehicle applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124110

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hossain Lipu, M. S., Hannan, M. A., Hussain, A., Ayob, A., Saad, M. H. M., Karim, T. F., & How, D. N. T.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Tenaga Nasional (MY)
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
  • American International University-Bangladesh (BD)
Corresponding author
Hussain, Aini
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
277
Pages
124110
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3084393668
Cited by
378
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 2
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Universiti Tenaga Nasional
  • Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (DIP-2018-020, 20190101LRGS)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, state of charge estimation, data-driven algorithms, electric vehicles, battery management systems, battery degradation, temperature effects, data preprocessing, hyperparameter optimization, activation functions, robustness under uncertainty, computational cost

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review